These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1084883)
1. Induction of cell-mediated immunity in the mouse: circumstantial evidence for highly immunogenic antigen in the regional lymph nodes following skin painting with contact sensitizing agents. Asherson GL; Mayhew B Isr J Med Sci; 1976; 12(4-5):454-67. PubMed ID: 1084883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the induction phase of contact sensitivity by footpad transfer of regional lymph node cells. Macrophages and radioresistant T-lymphocytes induce immunity. Asherson GL; Zembala M; Mayhew B Immunology; 1977 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 300354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of cyclophosphamide and irradiation on cells which suppress contact sensitivity in the mouse. Zembala M; Asherson GL Clin Exp Immunol; 1976 Mar; 23(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 1084814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The production of contact sensitivity by the injection into the footpads of recipients of the lymph node cells from mice 1 day after painting the skin with contact sensitizing agent: requirement for matching at the major histocompatibility complex between donor and recipient mice. Asherson GL; Mayhew B; Perera MA Immunology; 1979 May; 37(1):241-5. PubMed ID: 468300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immunogenic cells in the regional lymph nodes after painting with the contact sensitizers picryl chloride and oxazolone: evidence for the presence of IgM antibody on their surface. Asherson GL; Colizzi V; Watkins MC Immunology; 1983 Mar; 48(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 6826205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contact sensitivity and the DNA response in mice to high and low doses of oxazolone: low dose unresponsiveness following painting and feeding and its prevention by pretreatment with cyclophosphamide. Asherson GL; Perera MA; Thomas WR Immunology; 1979 Mar; 36(3):449-59. PubMed ID: 312260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induction of contact sensitivity. Selective induction of delayed hypersensitivity by the injection of cells from draining lymph nodes into the footpads of normal recipients. Thomas WR; Asherson GL; Perera MA Immunology; 1978 Apr; 34(4):725-31. PubMed ID: 721137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early and late contact sensitivity reactions in guinea pigs senstitzed to oxazolone. Baer H; Stone SH; Malik F J Immunol; 1976 Oct; 117(4):1159-63. PubMed ID: 977948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The migratory behavior of T blasts to contact sensitivity reactions in activelyand passively sensitized mice. Allwood GG Immunology; 1975 Apr; 28(4):681-92. PubMed ID: 1080131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of the immune response. I. Depression of DNA synthesis by immune lymph node cells. Asherson GL; Wood PJ; Mayhew B Immunology; 1975 Dec; 29(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 1193682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antigen-bearing dendritic cells in the draining lymph nodes of contact sensitized mice: cluster formation with lymphocytes. Cumberbatch M; Illingworth I; Kimber I Immunology; 1991 Sep; 74(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 1937567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinetics of local tissue and regional lymph node IL-2 and IFN-gamma responses in experimental oral mucosa and skin contact sensitivity in mice. Ahlfors EE; Lyberg T Scand J Immunol; 2010 Jul; 72(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 20591070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Soluble factors in tolerance and contact sensitivity to 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene in mice. I. Suppression of contact sensitivity by soluble suppressor factor released in vitro by lymph node cell populations containing specific suppressor cells. Moorhead JW J Immunol; 1977 Jul; 119(1):315-21. PubMed ID: 874323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antibody responses to contact sensitizing agents. Effect of sensitized cells. Thomas WR; Watkins MC; Wood PJ; Asherson GL Immunology; 1978 Mar; 34(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 305889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anti-Brucella cell-mediated immunity in mice vaccinated with a cell-wall fraction. Plommet M; Plommet AM Ann Rech Vet; 1987; 18(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 3451687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between keratinocyte expression of Ia and the intensity and duration of contact hypersensitivity responses in mice. Roberts LK; Spangrude GJ; Daynes RA; Krueger GG J Immunol; 1985 Nov; 135(5):2929-36. PubMed ID: 3862711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Antigen presenting cells and T lymphocytes in the induction phase of contact hypersensitivity]. Morita H; Yu M; Miyazaki T Nihon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 99(10):1075-84. PubMed ID: 2514306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antigen receptors on murine T lymphocytes in contact sensitivity. II. Presentation and characterization of syngeneic anti-idiotype serum against DNFB-sensitized T cells. Moorhead JW; Sy MS J Immunol; 1982 Jun; 128(6):2533-8. PubMed ID: 6176644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence for suppressor cell activity associated with depression of contact sensitivity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected mice. Campa M; Garzelli C; Ferrannini E; Falcone G Clin Exp Immunol; 1976 Nov; 26(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 991463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of T cells in the passive transfer of contact sensitivity and their occurrence in the bone marrow. Zembala M; Asherson GL Eur J Immunol; 1973 Nov; 3(11):667-80. PubMed ID: 4543870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]