218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10850266)
1. Resin composites in the post-amalgam age.
Lutz F; Krejci I
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Dec; 20(12):1138-44, 1146, 1148. PubMed ID: 10850266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
De Moor R; Delmé K
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
Lyons K;
N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The combined composite resin and amalgam restoration for posterior teeth: a clinical report.
Roda RS; Zwicker PF
Quintessence Int; 1992 Jan; 23(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 1631274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
Roulet JF
J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posterior composites for modern operative dentistry.
Douglas WH
J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):44-7. PubMed ID: 9120612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations in endodontically treated premolar teeth: a one-year evaluation.
Ahrari F; Nojoomian M; Moosavi H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Oct; 11(5):009-16. PubMed ID: 20978719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
el-Mowafy O
J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dental amalgam--what are the alternatives?
Tyas MJ
Int Dent J; 1994 Aug; 44(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7822054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
García-Godoy F
Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bond strength and clinical evaluation of a new dentinal bonding agent to amalgam and resin composite.
Olmez A; Ulusu T
Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):785-93. PubMed ID: 8628838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.
Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T
Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amalgam substitutes: a critical analysis.
Lutz F; Krejci I
J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(3):146-59. PubMed ID: 11324083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal behaviour of self-etch adhesive/composite and combined amalgam-composite restorations.
Kournetas N; Kakaboura A; Giftopoulos D; Chakmachi M; Rahiotis C; Geis-Gerstorfer J
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Jun; 18(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 20698421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
