124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10850773)
1. Universal model based on the mobile order and disorder theory for predicting lipophilicity and partition coefficients in all mutually immiscible two-phase liquid systems.
Ruelle P
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2000 May; 40(3):681-700. PubMed ID: 10850773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The n-octanol and n-hexane/water partition coefficient of environmentally relevant chemicals predicted from the mobile order and disorder (MOD) thermodynamics.
Ruelle P
Chemosphere; 2000 Mar; 40(5):457-512. PubMed ID: 10665387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The hydrophobic effect. 3. A key ingredient in predicting n-octanol-water partition coefficients.
Ruelle P; Kesselring UW
J Pharm Sci; 1998 Aug; 87(8):1015-24. PubMed ID: 9687346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating partition coefficients for fuel-water systems: developing linear solvation energy relationships using linear solvent strength theory to handle mixtures.
Arey JS; Gschwend PM
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 39(8):2702-10. PubMed ID: 15884367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Partitioning of solutes in different solvent systems: the contribution of hydrogen-bonding capacity and polarity.
el Tayar N; Tsai RS; Testa B; Carrupt PA; Leo A
J Pharm Sci; 1991 Jun; 80(6):590-8. PubMed ID: 1941553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Solubility and partitioning IV: Aqueous solubility and octanol-water partition coefficients of liquid nonelectrolytes.
Valvani SC; Yalkowsky SH; Roseman TJ
J Pharm Sci; 1981 May; 70(5):502-7. PubMed ID: 7241352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of partition and distribution coefficients in various solvent pairs with COSMO-RS.
Tshepelevitsh S; Hernits K; Leito I
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jun; 32(6):711-722. PubMed ID: 29846868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physicochemical determinants of passive membrane permeability: role of solute hydrogen-bonding potential and volume.
Goodwin JT; Conradi RA; Ho NF; Burton PS
J Med Chem; 2001 Oct; 44(22):3721-9. PubMed ID: 11606137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of solvent-accessible surface area in determining partition coefficients.
Dunn WJ; Koehler MG; Grigoras S
J Med Chem; 1987 Jul; 30(7):1121-6. PubMed ID: 3599019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 1-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients of n-Alkanes from Molecular Simulations of Absolute Solvation Free Energies.
Garrido NM; Queimada AJ; Jorge M; Macedo EA; Economou IG
J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Sep; 5(9):2436-46. PubMed ID: 26616624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a preformulation lipophilicity screen utilizing a C-18-derivatized polystyrene-divinylbenzene high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) column.
Lambert WJ; Wright LA; Stevens JK
Pharm Res; 1990 Jun; 7(6):577-86. PubMed ID: 2367326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The hydrophobic effect. 2. Relative importance of the hydrophobic effect on the solubility of hydrophobes and pharmaceuticals in H-bonded solvents.
Ruelle P; Kesselring UW
J Pharm Sci; 1998 Aug; 87(8):998-1014. PubMed ID: 9687345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hydrogen bonding. 32. An analysis of water-octanol and water-alkane partitioning and the delta log P parameter of seiler.
Abraham MH; Chadha HS; Whiting GS; Mitchell RC
J Pharm Sci; 1994 Aug; 83(8):1085-100. PubMed ID: 7983591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A water-free solvent system containing an L-menthol-based deep eutectic solvent for centrifugal partition chromatography applications.
Bezold F; Minceva M
J Chromatogr A; 2019 Feb; 1587():166-171. PubMed ID: 30573314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chemical and statistical considerations in the determination of partition coefficients of weakly ionizable drugs and poisons.
Opong-Mensah K; Woller TW; Obaseki AO; Porter WR
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1984; 2(3-4):381-94. PubMed ID: 16867718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two simulation methods to compute solvation free energies and partition coefficients.
Yang L; Ahmed A; Sandler SI
J Comput Chem; 2013 Feb; 34(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 23109246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating coal tar-water partitioning coefficient estimation methods and solute-solvent molecular interactions in tar phase.
Endo S; Xu W; Goss KU; Schmidt TC
Chemosphere; 2008 Sep; 73(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 18649918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting solvent-water partitioning of charged organic species using quantum-chemically estimated Abraham pp-LFER solute parameters.
Davis CW; Di Toro DM
Chemosphere; 2016 Dec; 164():634-642. PubMed ID: 27635646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of liquid-liquid partition coefficients by separation methods.
Berthod A; Carda-Broch S
J Chromatogr A; 2004 May; 1037(1-2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15214657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dependence of the distribution constant in liquid-liquid partition equilibria on the van der Waals molecular surface area.
Moldoveanu SC; David V
J Sep Sci; 2013 Sep; 36(18):2963-78. PubMed ID: 23868768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
