212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10850901)
1. Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume.
Nedelec B; Shankowsky HA; Tredget EE
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2000; 21(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 10850901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.
Tyack Z; Simons M; Spinks A; Wasiak J
Burns; 2012 Feb; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers.
Thompson CM; Sood RF; Honari S; Carrougher GJ; Gibran NS
Burns; 2015 Nov; 41(7):1442-8. PubMed ID: 26141527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP
Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 18388576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
Gankande TU; Wood FM; Edgar DW; Duke JM; DeJong HM; Henderson AE; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability.
Baryza MJ; Baryza GA
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1995; 16(5):535-8. PubMed ID: 8537427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The recovery of post-burn hypertrophic scar in a monitored pressure therapy intervention programme and the timing of intervention.
Li P; Li-Tsang CWP; Deng X; Wang X; Wang H; Zhang Y; Tan Z; He C
Burns; 2018 Sep; 44(6):1451-1467. PubMed ID: 29887351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical comparative study of pulsed dye laser and ultra-pulsed fractional carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of hypertrophic scars after burns].
Li N; Yang L; Cheng J; Han JT; Hu DH
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 34(9):603-607. PubMed ID: 30293363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
Forbes-Duchart L; Marshall S; Strock A; Cooper JE
J Burn Care Res; 2007; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A guide to choosing a burn scar rating scale for clinical or research use.
Tyack Z; Wasiak J; Spinks A; Kimble R; Simons M
Burns; 2013 Nov; 39(7):1341-50. PubMed ID: 23768711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrapulsed fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: evaluation of an in-patient controlled, standardized treatment approach.
Poetschke J; Dornseifer U; Clementoni MT; Reinholz M; Schwaiger H; Steckmeier S; Ruzicka T; Gauglitz GG
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Jul; 32(5):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 28401348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
Kantor J
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in subjective vs objective burn scar assessment over time: does the patient agree with what we think?
Martin D; Umraw N; Gomez M; Cartotto R
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2003; 24(4):239-44; discussion 238. PubMed ID: 14501421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Tuinebreijer WE; Middelkoop E; Kreis RW; van Zuijlen PP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. PubMed ID: 15253184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A study of using a simple 2D image analysis method to monitor the surface area of hypertrophic scars on hand during pressure therapy.
Yu A; Yick KL; Ng SP; Yip J; Chan YF
Burns; 2020 Nov; 46(7):1548-1555. PubMed ID: 32499048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.
Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM
Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: intrarater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):489-500. PubMed ID: 18388577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.
Truong PT; Abnousi F; Yong CM; Hayashi A; Runkel JA; Phillips T; Olivotto IA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Influence of parental compliance on the treatment of hypertrophic scars in burn children].
Song JH; Xia ZG; Zhou XL; Li XZ; Hu ZS; Li PT; Xu QL
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2021 May; 37(5):485-489. PubMed ID: 34044529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
