310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10851690)
1. [Therapeutic possibilities in trochanteric fractures. Safe--fast--stable].
Dávid A; von der Heyde D; Pommer A
Orthopade; 2000 Apr; 29(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 10851690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.
Madsen JE; Naess L; Aune AK; Alho A; Ekeland A; Strømsøe K
J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 9619458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison and analysis of reoperations in two different treatment protocols for trochanteric hip fractures - postoperative technical complications with dynamic hip screw, intramedullary nail and Medoff sliding plate.
Paulsson J; Stig JC; Olsson O
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):364. PubMed ID: 28836973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFN)].
Nuber S; Schönweiss T; Rüter A
Unfallchirurg; 2003 Jan; 106(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 12552392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of peritrochanteric fractures.
Bess RJ; Jolly SA
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 9322196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk].
Friedl W; Clausen J
Chirurg; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1344-52. PubMed ID: 11766660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail.
Park SY; Yang KH; Yoo JH; Yoon HK; Park HW
J Trauma; 2008 Oct; 65(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 18849802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mini-invasive nail versus DHS to fix pertrochanteric fractures: a case-control study.
Foulongne E; Gilleron M; Roussignol X; Lenoble E; Dujardin F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):592-8. PubMed ID: 19945367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation.
Curtis MJ; Jinnah RH; Wilson V; Cunningham BW
Injury; 1994 Mar; 25(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 8138307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A newly designed locked intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures fixation: results of the first 100 Trochanteric implantations.
Loubignac F; Chabas JF
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Apr; 95(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19345659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ender nail with interlocking mechanism or dynamic hip screw in pertrochanteric fractures? A prospective study extending its limits].
Muller B; Bonnaire F; Heckel T; Jaeger JH; Kempf I; Kuner EH
Unfallchirurgie; 1994 Feb; 20(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 8154055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of proximal femoral nail (PFN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) for the treatment of AO type A2 and A3 pertrochanteric fractures of femur.
Adeel K; Nadeem RD; Akhtar M; Sah RK; Mohy-Ud-Din I
J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 May; 70(5):815-819. PubMed ID: 32400733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [From the nail/plate to the dynamic hip screw--example of a generation change in implants for para-articular femoral fractures].
Kohlmann H; Vécsei V; Neugebauer G; Gottsauner-Wolf F
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1987 Oct; 99(19):677-82. PubMed ID: 3687027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The early failure of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw in femurs with a wide medullary canal. A biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures.
Ceynowa M; Zerdzicki K; Klosowski P; Pankowski R; Rocławski M; Mazurek T
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():201-207. PubMed ID: 31775090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
