267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10852337)
1. Specified principlism: what is it, and does it really resolve cases better than casuistry?
Strong C
J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):323-41. PubMed ID: 10852337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioethics as methodological case resolution: specification, specified principlism and casuistry.
Iltis AS
J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 10852335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Common morality versus specified principlism: reply to Richardson.
Gert B; Culver CM; Clouser KD
J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):308-22. PubMed ID: 11023380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The method of 'principlism': a critique of the critique.
Lustig BA
J Med Philos; 1992 Oct; 17(5):487-510. PubMed ID: 1431666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Moving forward in bioethical theory: theories, cases, and specified principlism.
Degrazia D
J Med Philos; 1992 Oct; 17(5):511-39. PubMed ID: 1431667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reply to Strong on principlism and casuistry.
Beauchamp TL
J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 11023381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The principlism debate: a critical overview.
Davis RB
J Med Philos; 1995 Feb; 20(1):85-105. PubMed ID: 7738461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Casuistry and principlism: the convergence of method in biomedical ethics.
Kuczewski M
Theor Med Bioeth; 1998 Dec; 19(6):509-24. PubMed ID: 10051788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defending principlism well understood.
Quante M; Vieth A
J Med Philos; 2002 Dec; 27(6):621-49. PubMed ID: 12607161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What really separates casuistry from principlism in biomedical ethics.
Cudney P
Theor Med Bioeth; 2014 Jun; 35(3):205-29. PubMed ID: 24846659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The problem of 'thick in status, thin in content' in Beauchamp and Childress' principlism.
Lee MJ
J Med Ethics; 2010 Sep; 36(9):525-8. PubMed ID: 20817819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strong on specification.
Jonsen AR
J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):348-60. PubMed ID: 10852338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Four approaches to doing ethics.
Levi BH
J Med Philos; 1996 Feb; 21(1):7-39. PubMed ID: 8740882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomy, discourse, and power: a postmodern reflection on principlism and bioethics.
McGrath P
J Med Philos; 1998 Aug; 23(5):516-32. PubMed ID: 9892038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New paths of medical ethics.
Covic A
Synth Philos; 1997; 12(2):559-71. PubMed ID: 15706724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Casuistry in medical ethics: rehabilitated, or repeat offender?
Tomlinson T
Theor Med; 1994 Mar; 15(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 8059432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What is the outcome of applying principlism?
Hine K
Theor Med Bioeth; 2011 Dec; 32(6):375-88. PubMed ID: 21710224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amenable to reason: Aristotle's rhetoric and the moral psychology of practical ethics.
London AJ
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2000 Dec; 10(4):287-305. PubMed ID: 11699543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Specifying, balancing, and interpreting bioethical principles.
Richardson HS
J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):285-307. PubMed ID: 10852336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Don't blame the 'bio'--blame the 'ethics': varieties of (bio)ethics and the challenge of pluralism.
Charlesworth M
J Bioeth Inq; 2005; 2(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 16025604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
