BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10853288)

  • 21. Infrared imaging for leak detection of N95 filtering facepiece respirators: a pilot study.
    Roberge RJ; Monaghan WD; Palmiero AJ; Shaffer R; Bergman MS
    Am J Ind Med; 2011 Aug; 54(8):628-36. PubMed ID: 21594885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A modified protocol for quantitative fit testing using the PortaCount.
    Sreenath A; Weed J; Church T
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Oct; 16(10):979-88. PubMed ID: 11599548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of subject characteristics and respirator features on respirator fit.
    Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Ann RB
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Dec; 2(12):641-9. PubMed ID: 16298949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a new qualitative test for fit testing respirators.
    Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Johnston AR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1995 Nov; 56(11):1068-73. PubMed ID: 7502992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An evaluation of irritant smoke to detect exhalation valve leakage in respirators.
    Snyder EM; McKay RT
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Sep; 18(9):702-7. PubMed ID: 12909538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of pressure drop on respirator faceseal leakage.
    Janssen L; Weber R
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Jul; 2(7):335-40. PubMed ID: 16020096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing.
    Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR; Zhuang Z
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):862-70. PubMed ID: 9866166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fit-testing for firefighters.
    Brickman CP
    Occup Health Saf; 1999 Jan; 68(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 9891408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of a large-scale quantitative respirator-fit testing program for healthcare workers: survey results.
    Wilkinson IJ; Pisaniello D; Ahmad J; Edwards S
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 31(9):918-25. PubMed ID: 20658919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of controlled negative pressure and aerosol quantitative respirator fit test systems by using human subjects.
    Crutchfield CD; Murphy RW; Van Ert MD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Jan; 54(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 8470618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force.
    Zhuang Z; Bradtmiller B; Shaffer RE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Sep; 4(9):647-59. PubMed ID: 17613722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride.
    Cho HW; Yoon CS; Lee JH; Lee SJ; Viner A; Johnson EW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):666-80. PubMed ID: 21742627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A new sampling technique that allows quantitative fit testing by using the employee's own respirator.
    Johnson BR; Bjork KA; Weed JB
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Dec; 53(12):776-9. PubMed ID: 1471599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of sampling probes for fit testing n95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Bergman MS; Viscusi DJ; Zhuang Z; Newcomb WE
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 May; 57(4):507-18. PubMed ID: 23258452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance of a novel real-time respirator seal integrity monitor on firefighters: Simulated workplace pilot study.
    Leppänen M; Wu B; Corey J; Yermakov M; Grinshpun SA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Aug; 15(8):607-615. PubMed ID: 29842832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A probability model for assessing exposure among respirator wearers: Part I--Description of the model.
    Nicas M; Spear RC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Jul; 53(7):411-8. PubMed ID: 1496931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. NIOSH respirator testing rules give industry some breathing room.
    Smith RB
    Occup Health Saf; 1994 Oct; 63(10):84-7. PubMed ID: 9156448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of controlled negative pressure and aerosol quantitative respirator fit test systems by using fixed leaks.
    Crutchfield CD; Murphy RW; Van Ert MD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Jun; 52(6):249-51. PubMed ID: 1858667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of fit testing on the protection offered by n95 filtering facepiece respirators against fine particles in a laboratory setting.
    Reponen T; Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Johnson E; McKay R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Apr; 55(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 21177265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Human subject testing of leakage in a loose-fitting PAPR.
    Johnson AT; Koh FC; Jamshidi S; Rehak TE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 May; 5(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 18348078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.