148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10853303)
21. Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, II: structure/function regression analysis in glaucoma.
Leung CK; Chong KK; Chan WM; Yiu CK; Tso MY; Woo J; Tsang MK; Tse KK; Yung WH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(10):3702-11. PubMed ID: 16186352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of HRT II and GDx imaging for glaucoma detection in a primary care eye clinic setting.
Andreou PA; Wickremasinghe SS; Asaria RH; Tay E; Franks WA
Eye (Lond); 2007 Aug; 21(8):1050-5. PubMed ID: 16691256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of test duration as a screening criterion for frequency doubling perimetry.
Thomas R; Parikh R; Muliyil J; Bhat S; George R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):562-3. PubMed ID: 15013885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preperimetric glaucoma assessment with scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC): analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer by sectors.
Baraibar B; Sánchez-Cano A; Pablo LE; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):659-64. PubMed ID: 18091451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of screening versus regular polarimetry.
Fingeret M; Patel T
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 83(7):426-31. PubMed ID: 16840868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Computer perimetry--rapid TOP (tendency oriented perimetry) and normal threshold methods in clinical practice--comparison of results].
Kratochvilová P
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2002 May; 58(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 12087665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of tendency-oriented perimetry and dynamic strategy in octopus perimetry as a screening tool in a clinical setting: a prospective study.
Scherrer M; Fleischhauer JC; Helbig H; Johann Auf der Heide K; Sutter FK
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):252-4. PubMed ID: 17458786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma.
Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 16865008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Glaucoma-screening with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II].
Kóthy P; Vargha P; Holló G
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Aug; 220(8):540-4. PubMed ID: 12953156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma.
Parikh RS; Parikh S; Sekhar GC; Kumar RS; Prabakaran S; Babu JG; Thomas R
Ophthalmology; 2007 Dec; 114(12):2238-43. PubMed ID: 17561260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Strategies for improving the diagnostic specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter.
Heeg GP; Stoutenbeek R; Jansonius NM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 15715557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Frequency doubling perimetry screening mode compared to the full-threshold mode.
Stoutenbeek R; Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):493-7. PubMed ID: 15491476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Long-term fluctuation of standard automatic perimetry, pulsar perimetry and frequency-doubling technology in early glaucoma diagnosis.
Gonzalez-Hernandez M; de la Rosa MG; de la Vega RR; Hernandez-Vidal A
Ophthalmic Res; 2007; 39(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 17952009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
King AJ; Taguri A; Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry.
Realini T; Lai MQ; Barber L
Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of community-based glaucoma screening using Frequency Doubling Technology and Heidelberg Retinal Tomography.
Robin TA; Müller A; Rait J; Keeffe JE; Taylor HR; Mukesh BN
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 12(3):167-78. PubMed ID: 16036475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Frequency-doubling technology: searching for the optimum diagnostic criteria for glaucoma.
Ferreras A; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Mayoral F; Honrubia FM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Feb; 85(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 17244214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Frequency doubling perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucomatous optic nerve fiber damage].
Korzekwa W; Korzekwa M; Markowska J; Wójcik-Niklewska B; Romaniuk W; Korzekwa A; Michalska-Małecka K
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):222-4. PubMed ID: 15510506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
