These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10854471)

  • 1. The visual communication of risk.
    Lipkus IM; Hollands JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1999; (25):149-63. PubMed ID: 10854471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designing Graphs to Communicate Risks: Understanding How the Choice of Graphical Format Influences Decision Making.
    Stone ER; Bruine de Bruin W; Wilkins AM; Boker EM; MacDonald Gibson J
    Risk Anal; 2017 Apr; 37(4):612-628. PubMed ID: 27862121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visualizing risks in cancer communication: A systematic review of computer-supported visual aids.
    Stellamanns J; Ruetters D; Dahal K; Schillmoeller Z; Huebner J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Aug; 100(8):1421-1431. PubMed ID: 28215828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making.
    Epstein RM; Alper BS; Quill TE
    JAMA; 2004 May; 291(19):2359-66. PubMed ID: 15150208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review.
    Ancker JS; Senathirajah Y; Kukafka R; Starren JB
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2006; 13(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 16929039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communicating projected survival with treatments for chronic kidney disease: patient comprehension and perspectives on visual aids.
    Dowen F; Sidhu K; Broadbent E; Pilmore H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Sep; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 28934951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On Effective Graphic Communication of Health Inequality: Considerations for Health Policy Researchers.
    Asada Y; Abel H; Skedgel C; Warner G
    Milbank Q; 2017 Dec; 95(4):801-835. PubMed ID: 29226437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The potential for graphical abstracts to enhance science communication.
    Krukowski RA; Goldstein CM
    Transl Behav Med; 2023 Dec; 13(12):891-895. PubMed ID: 37966942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving risk literacy in surgeons.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Wicki B; Joeris A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jul; 99(7):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 26879804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected].
    Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Apr; 70(7):1019-25. PubMed ID: 20116159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pictures speak louder than numbers: on communicating medical risks to immigrants with limited non-native language proficiency.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Dhami MK
    Health Expect; 2011 Mar; 14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):46-57. PubMed ID: 21323820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.
    Brust-Renck PG; Royer CE; Reyna VF
    Rev Hum Factors Ergon; 2013 Oct; 8(1):235-276. PubMed ID: 24999307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visualizing seismic risk and uncertainty: a review of related research.
    Bostrom A; Anselin L; Farris J
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():29-40. PubMed ID: 18469212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?
    Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Garcia-Retamero R; Anam R; Rodriguez R; Sharit J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 23916416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transparency in risk communication: graphical and analog tools.
    Kurz-Milcke E; Gigerenzer G; Martignon L
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():18-28. PubMed ID: 18469211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the positive effects of graphical risk information on comprehension: measuring attention directed to written, tabular, and graphical risk information.
    Smerecnik CM; Mesters I; Kessels LT; Ruiter RA; De Vries NK; De Vries H
    Risk Anal; 2010 Sep; 30(9):1387-98. PubMed ID: 20561265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations.
    Lipkus IM
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 17873259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes.
    Stone ER; Gabard AR; Groves AE; Lipkus IM
    J Health Commun; 2015; 20(10):1230-41. PubMed ID: 26065633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward a framework for understanding lay public's comprehension of disaster and bioterrorism information.
    Keselman A; Slaughter L; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Aug; 38(4):331-44. PubMed ID: 15978875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.