BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10854959)

  • 1. Validity and coverage of estimates of relative accuracy.
    Cheng H; Macaluso M; Hardin JM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2000 May; 10(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 10854959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the accuracy of two tests with a confirmatory procedure limited to positive results.
    Cheng H; Macaluso M
    Epidemiology; 1997 Jan; 8(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 9116081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests and culture in detecting Chlamydia in asymptomatic men.
    Cheng H; Macaluso M; Vermund SH; Hook EW
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 39(11):3927-37. PubMed ID: 11682509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing dichotomous screening tests when individuals negative on both tests are not verified.
    Chock C; Irwig L; Berry G; Glasziou P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Nov; 50(11):1211-7. PubMed ID: 9393377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of test sensitivity and specificity when disease confirmation is limited to positive results.
    Walter SD
    Epidemiology; 1999 Jan; 10(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 9888282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.
    Houssami N; Macaskill P; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(10):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 24746887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of breast cancer after false-positive test results in screening mammography.
    von Euler-Chelpin M; Risør LM; Thorsted BL; Vejborg I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 May; 104(9):682-9. PubMed ID: 22491228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sojourn time, sensitivity and positive predictive value of mammography screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-49.
    Duffy SW; Chen HH; Tabar L; Fagerberg G; Paci E
    Int J Epidemiol; 1996 Dec; 25(6):1139-45. PubMed ID: 9027517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
    Alonzo TA
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic or screening test accuracy when the reference standard is imperfect.
    Walter SD; Macaskill P; Lord SJ; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1129-38. PubMed ID: 22351623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of screening mammography and symptomatic status.
    Kavanagh AM; Giles GG; Mitchell H; Cawson JN
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 11002452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the conditional false-positive rate for semi-latent data.
    van der Merwe L; Maritz JS
    Epidemiology; 2002 Jul; 13(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 12094097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people.
    Cruciani M; Mengoli C; Loeffler J; Donnelly P; Barnes R; Jones BL; Klingspor L; Morton O; Maertens J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD009551. PubMed ID: 26343815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The latent class model for multiple binary screening tests.
    Lau TS
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(20):2283-95. PubMed ID: 9351165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mammography screening: presentation of scientific evidence as a basis for communication with women].
    Mühlhauser I; Höldke B
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct; 94(9):721-31. PubMed ID: 11127779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.