345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10856804)
1. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Roulet J
J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Wernecke KD; Roulet JF
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of pulse activation vs conventional light-curing on marginal adaptation of a compomer conditioned using a total-etch or a self-etch technique.
Luo Y; Lo EC; Wei SH; Tay FR
Dent Mater; 2002 Jan; 18(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 11740963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods.
Luo Y; Tay FR; Lo EC; Wei SH
J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):495-500. PubMed ID: 10960753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study.
Schuckar M; Geurtsen W
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique.
Loguercio AD; Alessandra R; Mazzocco KC; Dias AL; Busato AL; Singer Jda M; Rosa P
J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 12236642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
Lim CC; Neo J; Yap A
J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
Fourie J; Smit CF
SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of dentin deproteinization on microleakage of Class V composite restorations.
Toledano M; Perdigão J; Osorio R; Osorio E
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 11203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination.
Evancusky JW; Meiers JC
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10730285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal characteristics of different filling materials and filling methods with standardized cavity preparation.
Stoll R; Remes H; Kunzelmann KH; Stachniss V
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11317400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of an infiltrant on sealing of composite restoration margins with/without artificial caries.
Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu IF; Antonson SA; Campillo-Funollet M; Antonson D; Munoz-Viveros C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):717-25. PubMed ID: 25825096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
