These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10857719)
1. Reducing neglect by introducing ipsilesional global cues. Maguire A Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):328-32. PubMed ID: 10857719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field? Snow JC; Mattingley JB Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What kind of visual spatial attention is impaired in neglect? Natale E; Posteraro L; Prior M; Marzi CA Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(7):1072-85. PubMed ID: 15769493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study. Di Russo F; Aprile T; Spitoni G; Spinelli D Brain; 2008 Mar; 131(Pt 3):842-54. PubMed ID: 18024488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect. Ptak R; Golay L Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When they see, they see it almost right: normal subjective experience of detected stimuli in spatial neglect. Bonneh YS; Sagi D; Gorea A; Soroker N; Treger J; Pavlovskaya M Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 446(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18822347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classification images of two right hemisphere patients: a window into the attentional mechanisms of spatial neglect. Shimozaki S; Kingstone A; Olk B; Stowe R; Eckstein M Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):26-52. PubMed ID: 16497281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conditions of visual verbal extinction: does the ipsilesional stimulus have to be identified? Siéroff E; Urbanski M Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):563-9. PubMed ID: 12030508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The contribution of spatial remapping impairments to unilateral visual neglect. Pisella L; Mattingley JB Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2004 Apr; 28(2):181-200. PubMed ID: 15172763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reflexive orienting in spatial neglect is biased towards behaviourally salient stimuli. Ptak R; Schnider A Cereb Cortex; 2006 Mar; 16(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 15901652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of lateralized kinetic visual cues on visual search in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Butter CM; Kirsch N J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Dec; 17(6):856-67. PubMed ID: 8847392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sustained interactions between perception and action in visual extinction and neglect: evidence from sequential pointing. Kitadono K; Humphreys GW Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1592-9. PubMed ID: 19059423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of distracters, stimulus duration and hemianopia on first saccade in patients with unilateral neglect. Gainotti G; De Luca L; Figliozzi F; Doricchi F Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 19231479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Looking left with left neglect: the role of spatial attention when active vision selects local image features for fixation. Ptak R; Golay L; Müri RM; Schnider A Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19038381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the origin of line bisection error in hemianopia. Zihl J; Sämann P; Schenk T; Schuett S; Dauner R Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2417-26. PubMed ID: 19383505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are drawing perseverations part of the neglect syndrome? Pia L; Folegatti A; Guagliardo M; Genero R; Gindri P Cortex; 2009 Mar; 45(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 18708186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]