150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10858904)
1. Intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation during nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: how and when?
Klotz L
Curr Opin Urol; 2000 May; 10(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 10858904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cavernosal nerve mapping: current data and applications.
Klotz L
BJU Int; 2004 Jan; 93(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 14678359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neurostimulation during radical prostatectomy: improving nerve-sparing techniques.
Klotz L
Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 Feb; 18(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 10719931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy.
Klotz L; Heaton J; Jewett M; Chin J; Fleshner N; Goldenberg L; Gleave M
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1573-8. PubMed ID: 11025707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early experience with intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy.
Klotz L; Herschorn S
Urology; 1998 Oct; 52(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 9763068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cavernous nerve reconstruction to preserve erectile function following non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective study.
Chang DW; Wood CG; Kroll SS; Youssef AA; Babaian RJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 111(3):1174-81. PubMed ID: 12621188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the CaverMap device help preserve potency?
Kim HL; Mhoon DA; Brendler CB
Curr Urol Rep; 2001 Jun; 2(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 12084267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Nocturnal early erection as a parameter of postoperative organic erectile integrity].
Bannowsky A; Schulze H; van der Horst C; Stübinger JH; Portillo FJ; Jünemann KP
Urologe A; 2005 May; 44(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 15726311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability of results of cavernous nerve stimulation during radical prostatectomy.
Holzbeierlein J; Peterson M; Smith JA JR
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 11125376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation and Laser-Doppler flowmetry during radical prostatectomy.
Axelson HW; Johansson E; Bill-Axelson A
J Sex Med; 2013 Nov; 10(11):2842-8. PubMed ID: 22909402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nocturnal tumescence: a parameter for postoperative erectile integrity after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
Bannowsky A; Schulze H; van der Horst C; Seif C; Braun PM; Jünemann KP
J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):2214-7. PubMed ID: 16697842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A positive caver map response poorly predicts recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy.
Kim HL; Stoffel DS; Mhoon DA; Brendler CB
Urology; 2000 Oct; 56(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 11018602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative nerve stimulation predicts postoperative potency.
Chang SS; Peterson M; Smith JA
Urology; 2001 Oct; 58(4):594-7. PubMed ID: 11597546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of erectile function after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a single center.
Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Rozet F; Barret E; Giuliano F; Galiano M; Prapotnich D; Kazzazi A; Djavan B; Jaffe J; Cathelineau X; Vallancien G
Can J Urol; 2012 Aug; 19(4):6328-35. PubMed ID: 22892254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive approach for preserving cavernous nerves and erectile function after radical prostatectomy in the era of robotic surgery.
Haga N; Miyazaki T; Tsubouchi K; Okabe Y; Shibayama K; Emoto D; Matsuoka W; Maruta H; Aoyagi C; Matsuzaki H; Irie S; Nakamura N; Matsuoka H
Int J Urol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):360-368. PubMed ID: 33508871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comprehensive assessment of sexual function after retropubic non nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Trinchieri A; Nicola M; Masini F; Mangiarotti B
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2005 Dec; 77(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 16444937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary results of a monitoring system to confirm the preservation of cavernous nerves.
Kurokawa K; Suzuki T; SuzukI K; Terada N; Ito K; Yoshikawa D; Arai Y; Yamanaka H
Int J Urol; 2003 Mar; 10(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 12622709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subjective characterization of nerve sparing predicts recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy: defining the utility of a nerve sparing grading system.
Moskovic DJ; Alphs H; Nelson CJ; Rabbani F; Eastham J; Touijer K; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT; Mulhall JP
J Sex Med; 2011 Jan; 8(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 20727065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nerve grafting at the time of radical prostatectomy: should we be doing it?
Mancuso P; Rashid P
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):859-63. PubMed ID: 18959637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial comment on: Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Eden CG
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1143. PubMed ID: 18783871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
