These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10859409)

  • 1. Speech sound representation in the brain.
    Kraus N; Cheour M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):140-50. PubMed ID: 10859409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Native and non-native speech sound processing and the neural mismatch responses: A longitudinal study on classroom-based foreign language learning.
    Jost LB; Eberhard-Moscicka AK; Pleisch G; Heusser V; Brandeis D; Zevin JD; Maurer U
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jun; 72():94-104. PubMed ID: 25934634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech sound perception and learning: biologic bases.
    Kraus N; McGee TJ; Koch DB
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 49():7-17. PubMed ID: 10209772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic.
    Martin BA; Tremblay KL; Korczak P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):285-313. PubMed ID: 18453883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic-phonetic approach toward understanding neural processes and speech perception.
    Koch DB; McGee TJ; Bradlow AR; Kraus N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Jun; 10(6):304-18. PubMed ID: 10385873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mismatch negativity: clinical and other applications.
    Näätänen R; Escera C
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):105-10. PubMed ID: 10859407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential.
    Sharma A; Kraus N; McGee T; Carrell T; Nicol T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 7681392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonetic training and non-native speech perception--New memory traces evolve in just three days as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and behavioural measures.
    Tamminen H; Peltola MS; Kujala T; Näätänen R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jul; 97(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25956191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river.
    Picton TW; Alain C; Otten L; Ritter W; Achim A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):111-39. PubMed ID: 10859408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hyperarticulation of vowels enhances phonetic change responses in both native and non-native speakers of English: evidence from an auditory event-related potential study.
    Uther M; Giannakopoulou A; Iverson P
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():52-8. PubMed ID: 22771705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use.
    Ponton CW; Eggermont JJ; Don M; Waring MD; Kwong B; Cunningham J; Trautwein P
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):167-85. PubMed ID: 10859411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural representation of consciously imperceptible speech sound differences.
    Allen J; Kraus N; Bradlow A
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1383-93. PubMed ID: 11143450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The mismatch negativity as an index of the perception of speech sounds by the human brain].
    Näätänen R
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2000 Nov; 86(11):1481-501. PubMed ID: 11195215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory mismatch negativity for speech sound contrasts is modulated by language context.
    Lipski SC; Mathiak K
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jul; 19(10):1079-83. PubMed ID: 18580583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MMN to natural Arabic CV syllables: 2 - cross language study.
    Zeftawi MS
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):24-9. PubMed ID: 16055287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-feature discrimination in children with Asperger syndrome as determined with the multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm.
    Kujala T; Kuuluvainen S; Saalasti S; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Wendt LV; Lepistö T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1410-1419. PubMed ID: 20382070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory mismatch negativity: detecting spectral contrasts in a modulated noise.
    Stoody TM; Saoji AA; Atcherson SR
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Aug; 113(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 21987925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oscillatory power and functional connectivity in the speech change detection network.
    MacLean SE; Ward LM
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():320-334. PubMed ID: 27378440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Processing of affective speech prosody is impaired in Asperger syndrome.
    Korpilahti P; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Mattila ML; Kuusikko S; Suominen K; Rytky S; Pauls DL; Moilanen I
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2007 Sep; 37(8):1539-49. PubMed ID: 17086440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory processing of linguistic pitch as reflected by the mismatch negativity.
    Chandrasekaran B; Krishnan A; Gandour JT
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):552-8. PubMed ID: 19546808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.