These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10859547)

  • 1. Assessment of a three-dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer.
    Sun CC; Chiu AW; Chen KK; Chang LS
    Urol Int; 2000; 64(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 10859547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic skills training using a webcam trainer.
    Chung SY; Landsittel D; Chon CH; Ng CS; Fuchs GJ
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):180-3. PubMed ID: 15592070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks.
    Honeck P; Wendt-Nordahl G; Rassweiler J; Knoll T
    J Endourol; 2012 Aug; 26(8):1085-8. PubMed ID: 22721451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy: evaluation of physicians' performance and preference using a pelvic trainer.
    Ko JK; Li RH; Cheung VY
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 25461685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparative Study of Generic Visual Components of Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Images.
    El Boghdady M; Ramakrishnan G; Tang B; Alijani A
    World J Surg; 2018 Mar; 42(3):688-694. PubMed ID: 28936629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
    Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D vs. 2D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-an advantage? Results of standardised black box training in laparoscopic surgery.
    Buia A; Stockhausen F; Filmann N; Hanisch E
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Feb; 402(1):167-171. PubMed ID: 27761712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of 2D and 3D view on performance and time estimation in minimal invasive surgery.
    Blavier A; Nyssen AS
    Ergonomics; 2009 Nov; 52(11):1342-9. PubMed ID: 19851902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional (3D) simulation versus two-dimensional (2D) enhances surgical skills acquisition in standardised laparoscopic tasks: a before and after study.
    Ashraf A; Collins D; Whelan M; O'Sullivan R; Balfe P
    Int J Surg; 2015 Feb; 14():12-6. PubMed ID: 25560749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
    Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
    Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions.
    Haveran LA; Novitsky YW; Czerniach DR; Kaban GK; Taylor M; Gallagher-Dorval K; Schmidt R; Kelly JJ; Litwin DE
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jun; 21(6):980-4. PubMed ID: 17436042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of dynamic shadowing on 2D and 3D laparoscopic visualization under visible light and infrared light.
    Lee CS; Chui CK; Chang SK
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Jul; 23(7):561-9. PubMed ID: 23638852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of 3D and 2D imaging systems for laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection.
    Tang FJ; Qi L; Jiang HC; Tong SY; Li Y
    J Int Med Res; 2016 Jun; 44(3):613-9. PubMed ID: 26975511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.
    Storz P; Buess GF; Kunert W; Kirschniak A
    Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1454-60. PubMed ID: 22179446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set.
    Tanagho YS; Andriole GL; Paradis AG; Madison KM; Sandhu GS; Varela JE; Benway BM
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Nov; 22(9):865-70. PubMed ID: 23072406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-Dimensional Against 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right-sided Colon Cancer.
    Tao K; Liu X; Deng M; Shi W; Gao J
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Aug; 26(4):324-7. PubMed ID: 27438175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance.
    Falk V; Mintz D; Grünenfelder J; Fann JI; Burdon TA
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Nov; 15(11):1282-8. PubMed ID: 11727134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereoscopic visualization of laparoscope image using depth information from 3D model.
    Kumar A; Wang YY; Wu CJ; Liu KC; Wu HS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Mar; 113(3):862-8. PubMed ID: 24444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Study of 2D and 3D Optical Imaging Systems: Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in an Ex Vivo Model.
    Vilaça J; Pinto JP; Fernandes S; Costa P; Pinto JC; Leão P
    Surg Innov; 2017 Dec; 24(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 28871872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Initial experience with 3D vision laparoscopy and articulating shears.
    Abou-Haidar H; Al-Qaoud T; Jednak R; Brzezinski A; El-Sherbiny M; Capolicchio JP
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):426.e1-426.e5. PubMed ID: 27889223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.