347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10859905)
1. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview.
Dhaenens F
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems].
Spahn M; Heer V; Freytag R
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography.
Johnson M
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. FDA & digital mammography: why has FDA required full field digital mammography systems to be regulated as potentially dangerous devices for more than 10 years?
Nields MW
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 20380981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film.
D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography].
Fasbender R; Schaetzing R
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 12764585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Digital thorax radiography: flat-panel detector or storage phosphor plates].
Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Sailer J; Kabalan N; Herold C; Prokop M
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):351-61. PubMed ID: 12764583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital x-ray systems. Part 1. An introduction to DX technologies and an evaluation of cassette DX systems.
Health Devices; 2001 Aug; 30(8):273-310. PubMed ID: 11544777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)].
Weberling R
Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital mammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital x-ray: unwavering commitment collides with monumental challenges.
Freiherr G
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D4-7. PubMed ID: 10724732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
Honda C; Ohara H
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
