These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10860054)
1. The effect of elastomeric impression materials on the growth of micro-organisms. Tuit CM; Coogan MM SADJ; 1999 Oct; 54(10):464-9. PubMed ID: 10860054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resistance to disinfection of a polymicrobial association contaminating the surface of elastomeric dental impressions. Giammanco GM; Melilli D; Rallo A; Pecorella S; Mammina C; Pizzo G New Microbiol; 2009 Apr; 32(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 19579694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of the persistent presence of opportunistic pathogens on patient-derived dental impressions and gypsum casts. Egusa H; Watamoto T; Abe K; Kobayashi M; Kaneda Y; Ashida S; Matsumoto T; Yatani H Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18350950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. Caputi S; Varvara G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carriage of oral flora on irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials. Samaranayake LP; Hunjan M; Jennings KJ J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 2051359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials. Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with chlorinated compounds. Rweyendela IH; Patel M; Owen CP SADJ; 2009 Jun; 64(5):208, 210-2. PubMed ID: 19725332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Al-Jabrah O; Al-Shumailan Y; Al-Rashdan M Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 17580464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Persistence of 99mTc-labelled microorganisms on surfaces of impression materials. Keyf F; Anil N; Ercan MT; Etikan I; Yener O J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1995 Mar; 37(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7782817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components. Hondrum SO J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials. Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity. Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure. Hosseinpour D; Berg JC J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of time on the adhesion of light-body to heavy-body Express in the two-step reline polyvinylsiloxane impression technique. Purk JH; Hung SH; Chappell RP; Casper RL; Eick JD Am J Dent; 1990 Dec; 3(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 2095804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]