These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10861778)

  • 1. The (in)validity of sensitivity and specificity.
    Guggenmoos-Holzmann I; van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 2000 Jul; 19(13):1783-92. PubMed ID: 10861778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test data: a bivariate Bayesian modeling approach.
    Verde PE
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3088-102. PubMed ID: 21170904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based emergency medicine/editorial. The problem with sensitivity and specificity..
    Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Aug; 42(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 12883522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing a test.
    Koziol-McLain J; Lowenstein SR
    J Emerg Nurs; 1997 Apr; 23(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 9216296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using extended Rasch models to assess validity of diagnostic tests in the presence of a reference standard.
    Viallon V; Ecosse E; Mesbah M; Pouchot J; Coste J
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):376-93. PubMed ID: 23270981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-inferiority and superiority tests for partially matched data when a constraint is placed on the number of new tests.
    van de Ven PM; Berkhof J
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2515-28. PubMed ID: 23203862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On 'Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation'.
    Reiser B; Nakas CT
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):635-6. PubMed ID: 26776063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to comment on 'Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation'.
    Chen F; Xue Y; Tan MT; Chen P
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):637-40. PubMed ID: 26776064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
    van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature.
    Dodd JD; MacEneaney PM; Malone DE
    Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):915-22. PubMed ID: 14610687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rationale for the update algorithm of the graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures.
    Maurer W; Bretz F; Posch M
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Jul; 21(4):757-763. PubMed ID: 35819117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What you need to know about statistics Part I: validity of diagnostic and screening tests.
    Thomas RL; Zidan MA; Slovis TL
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Feb; 45(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 25636704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regarding the paper 'Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random'.
    Skaik YA
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2568. PubMed ID: 20954220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
    Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
    Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved confidence intervals for the sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
    Zhou XH; Qin G
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 15635678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating medical diagnostic tests at the subunit level in the presence of verification bias.
    Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2161-76. PubMed ID: 12820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using and interpreting diagnostic tests.
    McKenna SL; Dohoo IR
    Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2006 Mar; 22(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 16517302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic tests (2) - positive and negative predictive values.
    Smith CJ
    Phlebology; 2012 Sep; 27(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 23155153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.
    Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH
    Stat Med; 2011 Jan; 30(2):200. PubMed ID: 21204125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.