BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10861895)

  • 21. Two-level Haseman-Elston regression for general pedigree data analysis.
    Wang T; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 29(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 15838848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gain in efficiency from using generalized least squares in the Haseman-Elston test.
    Single RM; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):889-94. PubMed ID: 8788027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Power of a score test for quantitative trait linkage analysis of relative pairs.
    Goldstein DR; Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S85-91. PubMed ID: 11055375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improvement of the power to detect complex disease genes by regional inference procedures.
    Goldin LR; Chase GA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):785-9. PubMed ID: 9433578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: sib pair screening tests for linkage.
    Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 14968835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
    Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family-based association tests in genome screens.
    Chung RH; Hauser ER; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 17123303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of marker information on sib-pair linkage analysis of a rare disease.
    Korczak JF; Pugh EW; Premkumar S; Guo X; Elston RC; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):625-30. PubMed ID: 8787984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Empirical evaluation of genome scans for linkage of a quantitative trait associated with a complex disorder.
    Xu J; Panhuysen C; Taylor E; Wiesch D; Meyers D
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):927-32. PubMed ID: 9433602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sib-pair linkage analyses of nuclear family data: quantitative versus dichotomous disease classification.
    Korczak JF; Goldstein AM
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 9433585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Association of posterior p-values of S.A.G.E. SIBPAL proportion-IBD and Haseman-Elston statistics for ACTHR112.
    Gordon D; Finch SJ; Jacobs AL; Mendell NR; Single RM; Marr TG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 9433554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multipoint analysis using affected sib pairs: incorporating linkage evidence from unlinked regions.
    Liang KY; Chiu YF; Beaty TH; Wjst M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 21(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 11507720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transmission disequilibrium test with discordant sib pairs when parents are available.
    Deng HW; Chen WM; Recker RR
    Hum Genet; 2002 May; 110(5):451-61. PubMed ID: 12073016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Power calculations for a general class of tests of linkage and association that use nuclear families with affected and unaffected sibs.
    Kaplan NL; Martin ER
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 11855953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci: common tests vs. the asymptotically most powerful test.
    Schaid DJ; Nick TG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 2253870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A permutation test for the robust sib-pair linkage method.
    Wan Y; Cohen J; Guerra R
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):79-87. PubMed ID: 9066930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A test statistic to detect errors in sib-pair relationships.
    Ehm M; Wagner M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Jan; 62(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 9443861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.