BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10862048)

  • 1. Evaluation of the reliability of chromosomal imbalances detected by combined use of universal DNA amplification and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Harada T; Shiraishi K; Kusano N; Umayahara K; Kondoh S; Okita K; Sasaki K
    Jpn J Cancer Res; 2000 Nov; 91(11):1119-25. PubMed ID: 11092976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A whole-genome mouse BAC microarray with 1-Mb resolution for analysis of DNA copy number changes by array comparative genomic hybridization.
    Chung YJ; Jonkers J; Kitson H; Fiegler H; Humphray S; Scott C; Hunt S; Yu Y; Nishijima I; Velds A; Holstege H; Carter N; Bradley A
    Genome Res; 2004 Jan; 14(1):188-96. PubMed ID: 14707179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementing L-DNA analogs as mirrors of PCR reactant hybridization state: theoretical and practical guidelines for PCR cycle control.
    Spurlock N; Gabella WE; Nelson DJ; Evans DT; Pask ME; Schmitz JE; Haselton FR
    Anal Methods; 2024 May; 16(18):2840-2849. PubMed ID: 38567817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative genomic hybridisation in malignant deciduoid mesothelioma.
    Scattone A; Pennella A; Gentile M; Musti M; Nazzaro P; Buonadonna AL; Marzullo A; Cavone D; Pollice L; Serio G
    J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):764-9. PubMed ID: 16569690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization.
    Kuukasjärvi T; Tanner M; Pennanen S; Karhu R; Visakorpi T; Isola J
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Feb; 18(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 9115969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whole genome amplification for CGH analysis: Linker-adapter PCR as the method of choice for difficult and limited samples.
    Pirker C; Raidl M; Steiner E; Elbling L; Holzmann K; Spiegl-Kreinecker S; Aubele M; Grasl-Kraupp B; Marosi C; Micksche M; Berger W
    Cytometry A; 2004 Sep; 61(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15351986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whole genome amplification and molecular genetic analysis of DNA from paraffin-embedded prostate adenocarcinoma tumor tissue.
    Kim SH; Godfrey T; Jensen RH
    J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1512-8. PubMed ID: 10492247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple method for fixation and microdissection of frozen fresh tissue sections for molecular cytogenetic analysis of cancers.
    Huang Q; Sacks PG; Mo J; McCormick SA; Iacob CE; Guo L; Schaefer S; Schantz SP
    Biotech Histochem; 2005; 80(3-4):147-56. PubMed ID: 16298900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors.
    Huang Q; Schantz SP; Rao PH; Mo J; McCormick SA; Chaganti RS
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2000 Aug; 28(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 10862048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative genomic hybridization: an overview.
    Houldsworth J; Chaganti RS
    Am J Pathol; 1994 Dec; 145(6):1253-60. PubMed ID: 7992829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiplex Amplifiable Probe Hybridization (MAPH) methodology as an alternative to comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
    Kousoulidou L; Sismani C; Patsalis PC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 653():47-71. PubMed ID: 20721737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.