These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10862068)

  • 1. Detection of articular cartilage lesions: experimental evaluation of low- and high-field-strength MR imaging at 0.18 and 1.0 T.
    Woertler K; Strothmann M; Tombach B; Reimer P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Jun; 11(6):678-85. PubMed ID: 10862068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1-weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences.
    Fischbach F; Bruhn H; Unterhauser F; Ricke J; Wieners G; Felix R; Weiler A; Schröder RJ
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Feb; 46(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 15841742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
    Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental hyaline cartilage lesions: two-dimensional spin-echo versus three-dimensional gradient-echo MR imaging.
    Adam G; Nolte-Ernsting C; Prescher A; Bühne M; Bruchmüller K; Küpper W; Günther RW
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(6):665-72. PubMed ID: 1726647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
    Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and precision in the detection of articular cartilage lesions using magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla in an in vitro study with orthopedic and histopathologic correlation.
    Schaefer FK; Kurz B; Schaefer PJ; Fuerst M; Hedderich J; Graessner J; Schuenke M; Heller H
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Dec; 48(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18038353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
    Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificially produced cartilage lesions in small joints: detection with optimized MRI-sequences.
    Link TM; Lindner N; Haeussler M; Reimer P; Allkemper T; Jerosch J; Peterfy C; Majumdar S; Peters PE
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(8):949-56. PubMed ID: 9322214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
    Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of different MRT techniques in the diagnosis of degenerative cartilage diseases. In vitro study of 50 joint specimens of the knee at T1.5].
    Bachmann G; Heinrichs C; Jürgensen I; Rominger M; Scheiter A; Rau WS
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 9198516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination between fluid, synovium, and cartilage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: contrast enhanced Spin Echo versus non-contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed Gradient Echo MR imaging.
    Rand T; Imhof H; Czerny C; Breitenseher M; Machold K; Turetschek K; Trattnig S
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Feb; 54(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 10050739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR arthrography of the hip: diagnostic performance of a dedicated water-excitation 3D double-echo steady-state sequence to detect cartilage lesions.
    Knuesel PR; Pfirrmann CW; Noetzli HP; Dora C; Zanetti M; Hodler J; Kuehn B; Schmid MR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1729-35. PubMed ID: 15547220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Articular cartilage grading of the knee: diagnostic performance of fat-suppressed 3D volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) compared with 3D T1 high-resolution isovolumetric examination (THRIVE).
    Lee YH; Hahn S; Lim D; Suh JS
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 27207633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.
    Recht MP; Piraino DW; Paletta GA; Schils JP; Belhobek GH
    Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 8539380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synthetic-echo time postprocessing technique for generating images with variable T2-weighted contrast: diagnosis of meniscal and cartilage abnormalities of the knee.
    Andreisek G; White LM; Theodoropoulos JS; Naraghi A; Young N; Zhao CY; Mamisch TC; Sussman MS
    Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 20032152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Preliminary trial of three-dimensional water-excitation magnetization transfer contrast MR imaging of articular cartilage].
    Yoshioka H; Lang P; Ikeda K; Niitsu M; Itai Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Sep; 61(10):545-7. PubMed ID: 11676173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Davis KW; Shinki K; Kaplan LD; De Smet AA
    Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):839-48. PubMed ID: 19164121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.