These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10862340)

  • 1. Automatic and voluntary control of attention in young and older adults.
    Juola JF; Koshino H; Warner CB; McMickell M; Peterson M
    Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(2):159-78. PubMed ID: 10862340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aging and involuntary attention capture: electrophysiological evidence for preserved attentional control with advanced age.
    Lien MC; Gemperle A; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Mar; 26(1):188-202. PubMed ID: 20973601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
    Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: an fMRI study.
    Hietanen JK; Nummenmaa L; Nyman MJ; Parkkola R; Hämäläinen H
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):406-13. PubMed ID: 16949306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The modulation of visual orienting reflexes across the lifespan.
    Iarocci G; Enns JT; Randolph B; Burack JA
    Dev Sci; 2009 Sep; 12(5):715-24. PubMed ID: 19702764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm.
    Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 17469972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging and visual search: automatic and controlled attentional bias to threat faces.
    Hahn S; Carlson C; Singer S; Gronlund SD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):312-36. PubMed ID: 16524554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cue validity effects in response preparation: a pupillometric study.
    Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1196():94-102. PubMed ID: 18222417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex.
    Vossel S; Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16846742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory search following valid and invalid abrupt-onset cues.
    Homa D; Newton C; Terry D; Schafer S; Richter K
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):383-413. PubMed ID: 17892085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peripheral cuing by abrupt-onset cues: the influence of color in S-R corresponding conditions.
    Ansorge U; Heumann M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Jun; 116(2):115-43. PubMed ID: 15158179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
    Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the spatial metric of short-SOA costs of exogenous cuing.
    Chen P; Moore C; Mordkoff JT
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 18510134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative effectiveness of central, peripheral, and abrupt-onset cues in visual attention.
    Koshino H; Warner CB; Juola JF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Nov; 45(4):609-31. PubMed ID: 1484975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Differential visual attention scales directed by location versus semantic cue].
    Gao WB; Wei JH; Peng XH; Luo YJ
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2003 Feb; 16(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 12728955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-selective attention: evidence for a decline in old age.
    Quigley C; Andersen SK; Schulze L; Grunwald M; Müller MM
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Apr; 474(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 20219631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets.
    Juola JF; Koshino H; Warner CB
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 7770324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.