251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10862686)
1. Making the most of peer review.
Nat Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 3(7):629. PubMed ID: 10862686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19248983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
Frey JJ
Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Perfecting peer review?
Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peering into the review process.
Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Does editorial peer review work?
Lock S
Ann Intern Med; 1994 Jul; 121(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 8198351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Journalistic rights, and wrongs.
Mason DJ
Am J Nurs; 1999 Sep; 99(9):7. PubMed ID: 10489568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Harefuah peer review].
Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Art of Peer Review.
Fraser D
Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The discourteous reviewer.
Leviton A
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Peer review for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica].
Loría A; Lisker R
Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7973139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer Review of Scholarly Work.
Brandon D; McGrath JM
Adv Neonatal Care; 2018 Dec; 18(6):423-424. PubMed ID: 30499821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What can authors do for the papers they published in predatory journals?
Dadkhah M; Darbani SM
Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2016 Aug; 126(7-8):574-5. PubMed ID: 27510167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The peer review process: Giving and receiving advice.
Jull G; Moore A
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2019 Apr; 40():v. PubMed ID: 30773425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
Glimelius B
Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Open access under scrutiny.
Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
