251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10862686)
21. [Revista de Neurologia: the challenge of spreading the neurosciences in Spanish].
Matías-Guiu J
Rev Neurol; 2000 Jan 1-15; 30(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 10742993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Predatory publishers.
Odom-Forren J
J Perianesth Nurs; 2015 Apr; 30(2):87. PubMed ID: 25813294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The multiple faces of journal peer review.
Thatje S
Naturwissenschaften; 2010 Mar; 97(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 20127306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Farther, faster, and (hopefully) better!
Link AM; LaRusso NF
Gastroenterology; 1992 Sep; 103(3):1099-101. PubMed ID: 1499911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Article review process.
Burr G
Confed Aust Crit Care Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 4(3):17. PubMed ID: 1912646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Who referees the referees?
Isbister WH
Aust N Z J Surg; 1992 Mar; 62(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 1550501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Which scientific article is best qualified for publication?].
Barzilai M
Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):25-6. PubMed ID: 9332053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Why and how articles are accepted or rejected for publication in biomedical journals].
Trilla A
Med Clin (Barc); 1990 Dec; 95(19):732-4. PubMed ID: 2087121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Publishing opportunities for nurses: a comparison of 92 U.S. journals.
Swanson EA; McCloskey JC; Bodensteiner A
Image J Nurs Sch; 1991; 23(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 2022386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. JHS guidelines on systematic review and meta-analysis submissions.
Chung KC
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 37(6):1121-4. PubMed ID: 22624781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Peer-Review Mentorship: What It Is and Why We Need It.
Haase KR; Dzurec L
ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 2019; 42(3):191-192. PubMed ID: 31356351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Misunderstanding of disciplinary decisions].
Crul BV
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(40):2215. PubMed ID: 9864487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Structured abstracts.
Lock S
BMJ; 1988 Jul; 297(6642):156. PubMed ID: 3044505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Predatory publishers: what the nursing community needs to know.
International Academy of Nursing Editors "Predatory Publishing Practices" Collaborative
J Perianesth Nurs; 2015 Apr; 30(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 25813293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomedical Journals in India: some critical concerns.
Satyanarayana K; Sharma A
Indian J Med Res; 2010 Aug; 132():119-22. PubMed ID: 20716810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Blind dates in sciences: dealing with rejection in peer review.
Wang Y
Circ Res; 2014 Mar; 114(6):944-6. PubMed ID: 24625725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Advancing the Rigour and Integrity of Our Science: The Registered Reports Initiative.
Probst TM; Hagger MS
Stress Health; 2015 Aug; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 26250351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Diversity, debate, and discourse.
Haller KB
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1991; 20(4):283. PubMed ID: 1941289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Citation marketing and networking.
Couée I
Naturwissenschaften; 2011 Aug; 98(8):717-8. PubMed ID: 21656200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. When papers go bad--part 1, by Caveman.
J Cell Sci; 2004 Dec; 117(Pt 25):5953-4. PubMed ID: 15678575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
