503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10863086)
1. The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.
van Herk M; Remeijer P; Rasch C; Lebesque JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jul; 47(4):1121-35. PubMed ID: 10863086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.
Stroom JC; de Boer HC; Huizenga H; Visser AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(4):905-19. PubMed ID: 10098447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation.
van Herk M; Remeijer P; Lebesque JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Apr; 52(5):1407-22. PubMed ID: 11955756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy.
Killoran JH; Kooy HM; Gladstone DJ; Welte FJ; Beard CJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9054898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report.
Stroom JC; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2002 Jul; 64(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 12208578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: how much margin is needed?
Antolak JA; Rosen II
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1165-70. PubMed ID: 10421551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Loss of local control due to tumor displacement as a function of margin size, dose-response slope, and number of fractions.
Selvaraj J; Uzan J; Baker C; Nahum A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041715. PubMed ID: 23556885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Limitations of the planning organ at risk volume (PRV) concept.
Stroom JC; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Sep; 66(1):279-86. PubMed ID: 16904527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coping with interfraction time trends in tumor setup.
Giżyńska MK; Kukołowicz PF; Heijmen BJM
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):331-341. PubMed ID: 31721232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer.
Yan D; Lockman D; Brabbins D; Tyburski L; Martinez A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Aug; 48(1):289-302. PubMed ID: 10925000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiotherapy margin design with particular consideration of high curvature CTVs.
Herschtal A; Kron T; Fox C
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):684-97. PubMed ID: 19378729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?
Houghton F; Benson RJ; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J; Gemmill J; Dean JC; Routsis DS; Jefferies SJ; Burnet NG
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Nov; 21(9):720-7. PubMed ID: 19740637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PTV margin determination in conformal SRT of intracranial lesions.
Parker BC; Shiu AS; Maor MH; Lang FF; Liu HH; White RA; Antolak JA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):176-89. PubMed ID: 12132939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A strategy to objectively evaluate the necessity of correcting detected target deviations in image guided radiotherapy.
Yue NJ; Kim S; Jabbour S; Narra V; Haffty BG
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4340-7. PubMed ID: 18072499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strategy for online correction of rotational organ motion for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Rijkhorst EJ; van Herk M; Lebesque JV; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Dec; 69(5):1608-17. PubMed ID: 17919845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of interfractional shape variations based on statistical point distribution model for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Shibayama Y; Arimura H; Hirose TA; Nakamoto T; Sasaki T; Ohga S; Matsushita N; Umezu Y; Nakamura Y; Honda H
Med Phys; 2017 May; 44(5):1837-1845. PubMed ID: 28295382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of the shape and size of the clinical target volume on the planning target volume margin.
Zheng B; Huang Z; Li J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109244. PubMed ID: 25275442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
