These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10863264)

  • 1. The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: a proof of principle.
    Nicholson WR
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Jun; 23(5):369-70. PubMed ID: 10863264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Clustering Index method": a new technique for differentiation between neurogenic and myopathic changes using surface EMG.
    Uesugi H; Sonoo M; Stålberg E; Matsumoto K; Higashihara M; Murashima H; Ugawa Y; Nagashima Y; Shimizu T; Saito H; Kanazawa I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 May; 122(5):1032-41. PubMed ID: 20869308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: a proof of principle.
    Lehman GJ; McGill SM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1999 Sep; 22(7):444-6. PubMed ID: 10519560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Could electrical needle stimulation reduce diagnostic errors in electromyography?
    Vecchio M; Molteni F; Falsaperla R
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Aug; 25(4):236-7. PubMed ID: 18677190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of electromyographic amplitude values of the upper limb muscles during closed kinetic chain exercises with stable and unstable surfaces.
    de Araújo RC; Tucci HT; de Andrade R; Martins J; Bevilaqua-Grossi D; de Oliveira AS
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 18234507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface electromyography in the assessment of jaw elevator muscles.
    Castroflorio T; Bracco P; Farina D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 35(8):638-45. PubMed ID: 18466277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative surface EMG in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders.
    Wimalaratna HS; Tooley MA; Churchill E; Preece AW; Morgan HM
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002; 42(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 11977430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the surface EMG electrode on the compound muscle action potential.
    Barkhaus PE; Periquet MI; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006; 46(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 16929630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An alternative test of electromyographic normalization in patients.
    Hsu WL; Krishnamoorthy V; Scholz JP
    Muscle Nerve; 2006 Feb; 33(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 16281276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of interelectrode distance over the innervation zone and normalization on the electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus concentric, eccentric, and isometric torque relationships for the vastus lateralis muscle.
    Beck TW; Housh TJ; Cramer JT; Weir JP
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Apr; 19(2):219-31. PubMed ID: 17884581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motor unit action potential analysis of the paraspinal muscles. Paraspinal MUAP analysis is not useful.
    Trojaborg W
    Muscle Nerve; 2004 Mar; 29(3):454-5. PubMed ID: 14981749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-level exertions of the neck musculature: a study of research methods.
    Joines SM; Sommerich CM; Mirka GA; Wilson JR; Moon SD
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Oct; 16(5):485-97. PubMed ID: 16500118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relevance of motion artifact in electromyography recordings during vibration treatment.
    Fratini A; Cesarelli M; Bifulco P; Romano M
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):710-8. PubMed ID: 18495492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological variance associated with normalization of occupational upper trapezius EMG using sub-maximal reference contractions.
    Jackson JA; Mathiassen SE; Dempsey PG
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Jun; 19(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 18155593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of electromyographic normalization methods for evaluating the hip musculature.
    Bolgla LA; Uhl TL
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 16423539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface electromyography frequency analysis as a diagnostic tool.
    Chaffin DB
    J Occup Med; 1969 Mar; 11(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 5789601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EMG normalization to study muscle activation in cycling.
    Rouffet DM; Hautier CA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Oct; 18(5):866-78. PubMed ID: 17507240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating contraction level using root mean square amplitude in control subjects and patients with neuromuscular disorders.
    Boe SG; Rice CL; Doherty TJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):711-8. PubMed ID: 18374002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical manifestations of muscle fatigue during concentric and eccentric isokinetic knee flexion-extension movements.
    Molinari F; Knaflitz M; Bonato P; Actis MV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1309-16. PubMed ID: 16830935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electromyographic studies of structural abnormalities. 1941.
    Denslow JS; Clough GH
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2001 Feb; 101(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 11296808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.