These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10863402)

  • 1. Detection of small lesions in alveolar bone by digital subtraction radiography.
    Ying SY; Chen X; Zhang G; Cao CF
    Chin J Dent Res; 1999 May; 2(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 10863402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Detection of small alveolar bone lesions by digital subtraction radiography].
    Zhou S; Ma X; Zhang G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1998 Mar; 33(2):70-2. PubMed ID: 11774691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions.
    Parsell DE; Gatewood RS; Watts JD; Streckfus CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for assessment of bone density changes following periodontal guided tissue regeneration.
    Christgau M; Wenzel A; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 9084282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging.
    Stassinakis A; Brägger U; Stojanovic M; Bürgin W; Lussi A; Lang NP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 9161167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of experimentally induced lesions in subtraction images of cancellous alveolar bone.
    Katsarsky JW; Levine MS; Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jun; 77(6):674-7. PubMed ID: 8065737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography for determining changes in calcium mass in mandibular bone: an in vitro study.
    Christgau M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Kolbeck C; Wenzel A
    J Periodontal Res; 1998 Apr; 33(3):138-49. PubMed ID: 9651875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of simulated periodontal bone gain by digital subtraction radiography with tuned-aperture computed tomography. The effect of angular disparity.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 11313728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of induced mid-buccal/lingual alveolar bone defects.
    Nair MK; Bezik J
    J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1833-8. PubMed ID: 17076608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical methodology in quantitative digital subtraction radiography: analyses of the aluminum reference wedge.
    Allen KM; Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1317-21. PubMed ID: 8997679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using radiographs exposed in a multicenter trial.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; Magnusson I; Johnson B; Meredith MP; Cavanaugh PF; Gerlach RW
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Apr; 31(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 8814584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of variations in projection geometry and lesion size on detection of computer-simulated crestal alveolar bone lesions by subtraction radiography.
    Hausmann E; Allen KM; Piedmonte MR
    J Periodontal Res; 1991 Jan; 26(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 1825334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.