250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10863421)
41. Preliminary evaluation of titanium-coated PEEK dental implants.
Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 8699511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Interfacial shear strength of endosseous implants.
Butz F; Ogawa T; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 21841983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effect of hydroxyapatite and titania nanostructures on early in vivo bone response.
Meirelles L; Melin L; Peltola T; Kjellin P; Kangasniemi I; Currie F; Andersson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):245-54. PubMed ID: 18384406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. In vivo performance of a modified CSTi dental implant coating.
Story BJ; Wagner WR; Gaisser DM; Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):749-57. PubMed ID: 9857585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The effect of injectable calcium phosphate cement on bone anchorage of titanium implants: an experimental feasibility study in dogs.
Arisan V; Anil A; Wolke JG; Ozer K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 39(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 20153605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and zirconia-reinforced hydroxyapatite composite coatings: in vivo study.
Lee TM; Yang CY; Chang E; Tsai RS
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Dec; 71(4):652-60. PubMed ID: 15505828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Enhanced bone bonding of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants by electrical polarization.
Kobayashi T; Itoh S; Nakamura S; Nakamura M; Shinomiya K; Yamashita K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jul; 82(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 17269143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation on the movement of endosseous titanium implants under continuous orthodontic forces: an experimental study in the dog.
Hsieh YD; Su CM; Yang YH; Fu E; Chen HL; Kung S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):618-23. PubMed ID: 18422988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The bone-metal interface of defect and press-fit ingrowth of microwave plasma-chemical vapor deposition implants in the rabbit model.
Rupprecht S; Bloch-Birkholz A; Lethaus B; Rosiwal S; Neukam FW; Schlegel A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 15642036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Implants placed in an irradiated dog mandible: a morphometric analysis.
Brogniez V; D'Hoore W; Grégoire V; Munting E; Reychler H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):511-8. PubMed ID: 10960984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. An in vivo analysis of an elliptical dental implant design.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Gaisser DM; Wagner WR
J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 8007024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
Freire JN; Silva NR; Gil JN; Magini RS; Coelho PG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):704.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17561041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Osseointegration of oxidized and turned implants in circumferential bone defects with and without adjunctive therapies: an experimental study on BMP-2 and autogenous bone graft in the dog mandible.
Salata LA; Burgos PM; Rasmusson L; Novaes AB; Papalexiou V; Dahlin C; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 17027235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat.
Kohal RJ; Wolkewitz M; Hinze M; Han JS; Bächle M; Butz F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 19298287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. In vivo evaluation of hydroxyapatite coatings of different crystallinities.
Oh S; Tobin E; Yang Y; Carnes DL; Ong JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 16274146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
