BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10863628)

  • 1. Sonographic and clinical methods in the diagnosis of macrosomia.
    O'Reilly-Green C; Divon M
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 43(2):309-20. PubMed ID: 10863628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnosis of macrosomia in the postdates population: combining sonographic estimates of fetal weight with glucose challenge testing.
    Sylvestre G; Divon MY; Onyeije C; Fisher M
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(5):287-90. PubMed ID: 11132584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements.
    Chauhan SP; West DJ; Scardo JA; Boyd JM; Joiner J; Hendrix NW
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 95(5):639-42. PubMed ID: 10775720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrapartum detection of a macrosomic fetus: clinical versus 8 sonographic models.
    Chauhan SP; Cowan BD; Magann EF; Bradford TH; Roberts WE; Morrison JC
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Aug; 35(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 8546640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?
    Combs CA; Rosenn B; Miodovnik M; Siddiqi TA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies and suspected fetal macrosomia.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Hod M
    J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 15085885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Receiver operating characteristic curves of sonographic estimated fetal weight for prediction of macrosomia in prolonged pregnancies.
    O'Reilly-Green CP; Divon MY
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):403-8. PubMed ID: 9239826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
    Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of macrosomia by serial sonographic measurements of fetal soft-tissues and the liver in women with pregestational diabetes.
    Garabedian C; Vambergue A; Salleron J; Deruelle P
    Diabetes Metab; 2013 Dec; 39(6):511-8. PubMed ID: 23643348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia cannot be improved by combination with pregnancy-specific characteristics.
    Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Burkhardt T; Wisser J; Kurmanavicius J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 19266500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
    Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the availability of maternal HbA1c results improve the accuracy of sonographic diagnosis of macrosomia?
    Weissmann-Brenner A; O'Reilly-Green C; Ferber A; Divon MY
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 23(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 15133797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and internal validation of a nomogram to predict macrosomia.
    Mazouni C; Rouzier R; Ledu R; Heckenroth H; Guidicelli B; Gamerre M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 17444564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
    Shmueli A; Salman L; Hadar E; Aviram A; Bardin R; Ashwal E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the amniotic fluid index combined with estimated fetal weight within 10 days of delivery for prediction of macrosomia at birth.
    Ben-Haroush A; Melamed N; Mashiach R; Meizner I; Yogev Y
    J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):1029-32. PubMed ID: 18577666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used.
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Pardo J; Ben-Haroush A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21229567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal biacromial diameter as a new ultrasound measure for prediction of macrosomia in term pregnancy: a prospective observational study.
    Youssef AEA; Amin AF; Khalaf M; Khalaf MS; Ali MK; Abbas AM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(16):2674-2679. PubMed ID: 29478363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
    Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Third trimester ultrasound soft-tissue measurements accurately predicts macrosomia.
    Maruotti GM; Saccone G; Martinelli P
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Apr; 30(8):972-976. PubMed ID: 27294775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonographic estimate of birth weight: relative accuracy of sonographers versus maternal-fetal medicine specialists.
    Humphries J; Reynolds D; Bell-Scarbrough L; Lynn N; Scardo JA; Chauhan SP
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Feb; 11(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 12375539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.