These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10863628)

  • 21. Intrapartum prediction of macrosomia: accuracy of abdominal circumference estimation.
    Al-Inany H; Alaa N; Momtaz M; Abdel Badii M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2001; 51(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 11223705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia.
    Chaabane K; Trigui K; Louati D; Kebaili S; Gassara H; Dammak A; Amouri H; Guermazi M
    Pan Afr Med J; 2013; 14():111. PubMed ID: 23717725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detecting fetal macrosomia with abdominal circumference alone.
    Henrichs C; Magann EF; Brantley KL; Crews JH; Sanderson M; Chauhan SP
    J Reprod Med; 2003 May; 48(5):339-42. PubMed ID: 12815906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using sonographically measured abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness.
    Petrikovsky BM; Oleschuk C; Lesser M; Gelertner N; Gross B
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1997 Sep; 25(7):378-82. PubMed ID: 9282803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prenatal prediction of postnatal large-for-dates neonates using a simplified MRI method: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound estimates.
    Kadji C; Cannie MM; De Angelis R; Camus M; Klass M; Fellas S; Cecotti V; Dütemeyer V; Jani JC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 28508549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical and ultrasound prediction of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancy.
    Johnstone FD; Prescott RJ; Steel JM; Mao JH; Chambers S; Muir N
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Aug; 103(8):747-54. PubMed ID: 8760702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of 2- and 3-Dimensional Sonography for Estimation of Birth Weight and Neonatal Adiposity in the Setting of Suspected Fetal Macrosomia.
    Gibson KS; Stetzer B; Catalano PM; Myers SA
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1123-9. PubMed ID: 27091915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prenatal detection and consequences of fetal macrosomia.
    Bamberg C; Hinkson L; Henrich W
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2013; 33(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 23221275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Macrosomia in postdates pregnancies: the accuracy of routine ultrasonographic screening.
    Pollack RN; Hauer-Pollack G; Divon MY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 167(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1442959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight performed during labor by residents.
    Noumi G; Collado-Khoury F; Bombard A; Julliard K; Weiner Z
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1407-9. PubMed ID: 15902122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review.
    Coomarasamy A; Connock M; Thornton J; Khan KS
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1461-6. PubMed ID: 16225563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord as a predictor of fetal macrosomia.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Siesto G; Bergamini V; Raio L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 30(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 17960667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models.
    McLaren RA; Puckett JL; Chauhan SP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):565-9. PubMed ID: 7898834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Combined analysis with amniotic fluid index and estimated fetal weight for prediction of severe macrosomia at birth.
    Hackmon R; Bornstein E; Ferber A; Horani J; O'Reilly Green CP; Divon MY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 196(4):333.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17403410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sonographic diagnosis of IUGR-macrosomia.
    Zimmer EZ; Divon MY
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 35(1):172-84. PubMed ID: 1544242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identification of newborns with birthweight ≥ 4,500g: Ultrasound within one- vs. two weeks of delivery.
    Bicocca MJ; Le TN; Zhang CC; Blackburn B; Blackwell SC; Sibai BM; Chauhan SP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():47-53. PubMed ID: 32353616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The evaluation of accelerated fetal growth.
    Lurie S; Zalel Y; Hagay ZJ
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 7(6):477-81. PubMed ID: 8620083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia.
    Loetworawanit R; Chittacharoen A; Sututvoravut S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S60-4. PubMed ID: 17726811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of conventional 2D ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging for prenatal estimation of birthweight in twin pregnancy.
    Kadji C; Bevilacqua E; Hurtado I; Carlin A; Cannie MM; Jani JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):128.e1-128.e11. PubMed ID: 29045850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.