202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10864075)
1. Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model.
Han JK; Kim AY; Lee KY; Seo JB; Kim TK; Choi BI; Lhee CS; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 10864075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hepatic CT enhancement: effect of the rate and volume of contrast medium injection in an animal model.
Garcia P; Genin G; Bret PM; Bonaldi VM; Reinhold C; Atri M
Abdom Imaging; 1999; 24(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 10525816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study.
Tsurusaki M; Sugimoto K; Fujii M; Sugimura K
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast material injection for hepatic helical computed tomography. Comparative study of five protocols.
Hoeffel C; Legmann P; Girardot C; Bunouf P; Mezzi K; Bonnin A
Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 8854192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT.
Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Tsuda K; Tomoda K; Narumi Y; Oi H; Nakamura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 9694469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of duration of contrast material injection on peak enhancement times and values of the aorta, main portal vein, and liver at dynamic MDCT with the dose of contrast medium tailored to patient weight.
Erturk SM; Ichikawa T; Sou H; Tsukamoto T; Motosugi U; Araki T
Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 18275866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic CT scanning of the normal canine liver: interpretation of time density curves resulting from an intravenous bolus injection of contrast material.
Jaschke W; Lipton MJ; Boyd D; Moss AA; Cann C; Goldberg HI; Margulis AR; Sievers R
Eur J Radiol; 1985 Nov; 5(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 2935396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hepatic contrast enhancement at CT: influence of intravenous glucagon in a canine model.
Warshauer DM; Hiken JN; Molina PL; Hackney SL; Bellinger DA; Lee JK
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 7480678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.
Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two contrast materials with different iodine concentrations in enhancing the density of the the aorta, portal vein and liver at multi-detector row CT: a randomized study.
Suzuki H; Oshima H; Shiraki N; Ikeya C; Shibamoto Y
Eur Radiol; 2004 Nov; 14(11):2099-104. PubMed ID: 15309493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of catheter size and injection rate of contrast agent on enhancement and image quality for triple-phase helical computed tomography of the liver in small dogs.
Lee SK; Lee D; Kim D; Cha A; Choi J
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2017 Nov; 58(6):664-670. PubMed ID: 28752521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Establishment of optimal scan delay for multi-phase computed tomography using bolus-tracking technique in canine pancreas.
Choi SY; Choi HJ; Lee KJ; Lee YW
J Vet Med Sci; 2015 Sep; 77(9):1049-54. PubMed ID: 25843155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of contrast injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight and fixed injection duration on aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector-row helical CT.
Awai K; Hori S
Eur Radiol; 2003 Sep; 13(9):2155-60. PubMed ID: 12736754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement.
Kondo H; Kanematsu M; Goshima S; Miyoshi T; Shiratori Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 17312064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease.
Furuta A; Ito K; Fujita T; Koike S; Shimizu A; Matsunaga N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jul; 183(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 15208131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of two injection protocols by time-density curves for possible application to hepatic dynamic and upper abdominal CT angiography in MDCT: high concentration (350 mgI/ml) with conventional volume (100 ml) vs. conventional concentration (300 mgI/ml) with larger volume (150 ml) and higher injection rate].
Matoba M; Yokota H; Yabuno K; Kuga G; Tinami H; Yamamoto I
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Feb; 63(3):98-102. PubMed ID: 12692964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of time to peak contrast enhancement of the aorta and liver for dual-phase computed tomography on the basis of contrast medium arrival time, injection duration, and injection technique in dogs.
Chau J; Young AC; Dhand N; Makara MA
Am J Vet Res; 2016 Oct; 77(10):1093-100. PubMed ID: 27668580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
