105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10864198)
1. Feasibility of a dose-intensive CMF regimen with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer.
Bos AM; de Graaf H; de Vries EG; Piersma H; Willemse PH
Br J Cancer; 2000 Jun; 82(12):1920-4. PubMed ID: 10864198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premonopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer: indirect comparison of dose and schedule in DBCG trials 77, 82, and 89.
Ejlertsen B; Mouridsen HT; Jensen MB
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):662-71. PubMed ID: 18465334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Feasibility of a cyclophosphamide methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil regime intravenously administered with and without granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in surgically treated breast carcinoma].
Garrone O; Del Mastro L; Mariani GL; Ardizzoni A; Venturini M; Rosso R
Minerva Med; 1993 Sep; 84(9):467-72. PubMed ID: 7504219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjuvant dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, CMF and weekly paclitaxel in patients with resected high-risk breast cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study.
Papadimitriou CA; Papakostas P; Timotheadou E; Aravantinos G; Bamias A; Fountzilas G
Cancer Invest; 2008 Jun; 26(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 18568771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional adjuvant chemotherapy versus single-cycle, autograft-supported, high-dose, late-intensification chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: a randomized trial.
Leonard RC; Lind M; Twelves C; Coleman R; van Belle S; Wilson C; Ledermann J; Kennedy I; Barrett-Lee P; Perren T; Verrill M; Cameron D; Foster E; Yellowlees A; Crown J;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Jul; 96(14):1076-83. PubMed ID: 15265969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer in women 60 years and older: feasibility and tolerability in a subset of patients in a randomized trial.
Kümmel S; Krocker J; Kohls A; Breitbach GP; Morack G; Budner M; Blohmer JU; Lichtenegger W; Elling D
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2006 May; 58(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16387512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Paclitaxel and epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil for patients with stage IIIC breast cancer with ten or more involved axillary lymph nodes.
Battelli N; Massacesi C; Braconi C; Pilone A; Manzione L; Dinota A; Cobelli S; Scanni A; Sturba F; Giacomini G; Morale D; Giorgi F; Tummarello D; Cascinu S
Am J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 29(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 16891866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) versus hormonal ablation with leuprorelin acetate as adjuvant treatment of node-positive, premenopausal breast cancer patients: preliminary results of the TABLE-study (Takeda Adjuvant Breast cancer study with Leuprorelin Acetate).
Schmid P; Untch M; Wallwiener D; Kossé V; Bondar G; Vassiljev L; Tarutinov V; Kienle E; Lüftner D; Possinger K;
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2325-32. PubMed ID: 12174922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with rotational CMF, epirubicin and vincristine as primary chemotherapy in operable breast carcinoma.
Cocconi G; Di Blasio B; Boni C; Bisagni G; Ceci G; Rondini E; Bella M; Leonardi F; Savoldi L; Camisa R; Bruzzi P
Cancer; 2002 Jul; 95(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 12124820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral uracil and tegafur compared with classic cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil as postoperative chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, high-risk breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Study for Breast Cancer 01 Trial.
Watanabe T; Sano M; Takashima S; Kitaya T; Tokuda Y; Yoshimoto M; Kohno N; Nakagami K; Iwata H; Shimozuma K; Sonoo H; Tsuda H; Sakamoto G; Ohashi Y
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(9):1368-74. PubMed ID: 19204202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural history of more than 20 years of node-positive primary breast carcinoma treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy: a study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.
Weiss RB; Woolf SH; Demakos E; Holland JF; Berry DA; Falkson G; Cirrincione CT; Robbins A; Bothun S; Henderson IC; Norton L;
J Clin Oncol; 2003 May; 21(9):1825-35. PubMed ID: 12721260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concurrent cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma: a well tolerated adjuvant regimen.
Isaac N; Panzarella T; Lau A; Mayers C; Kirkbride P; Tannock IF; Vallis KA
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(4):696-703. PubMed ID: 12209711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5.
Levine MN; Pritchard KI; Bramwell VH; Shepherd LE; Tu D; Paul N;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Aug; 23(22):5166-70. PubMed ID: 16051958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the prognostic effects of inclusion in a clinical trial and of myelosuppression on survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma.
Mayers C; Panzarella T; Tannock IF
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 91(12):2246-57. PubMed ID: 11413512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Randomized comparative study of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) and UFT-tamoxifen regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for breast cancer: Tochigi Prefectural Study Group for Post-Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy].
Tamura H; Kojima M; Kobayashi H; Ando J; Oka S; Fujisaki M; Wada N; Imoto S; Ikeda T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 Jul; 27(7):993-1002. PubMed ID: 10925684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical relevance of different sequencing of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and Fluorouracil in operable breast cancer.
Bonadonna G; Zambetti M; Moliterni A; Gianni L; Valagussa P
J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(9):1614-20. PubMed ID: 15117983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similar efficacy for ovarian ablation compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: from a randomized comparison of premenopausal patients with node-positive, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
Ejlertsen B; Mouridsen HT; Jensen MB; Bengtsson NO; Bergh J; Cold S; Edlund P; Ewertz M; de Graaf PW; Kamby C; Nielsen DL
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Nov; 24(31):4956-62. PubMed ID: 17075113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-dose sequential epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with peripheral blood stem cell support for advanced breast cancer: results of a phase II study.
Cottu PH; Extra JM; Espie M; Marolleau JP; de Roquancourt A; Makke J; Miclea JM; Laurence V; Mayeur D; Lerebours F; Cuvier C; Marty M
Br J Cancer; 2001 Nov; 85(9):1240-6. PubMed ID: 11720455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin with G-CSF support in patients with relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer: feasibility and efficacy.
Huisman C; Biesma B; Postmus PE; Giaccone G; Schramel FM; Smit EF
Br J Cancer; 2001 Nov; 85(10):1456-61. PubMed ID: 11720428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The potential risk of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients--results from a prospective randomized trial of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG-07).
Taucher S; Steger GG; Jakesz R; Tausch C; Wette V; Schippinger W; Kwasny W; Reiner G; Greil R; Dubsky P; Poestlberger S; Tschmelitsch J; Samonigg H; Gnant M;
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Nov; 112(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 18080748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
