66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10864542)
1. Management guidelines for women with normal colposcopy after low grade cervical abnormalities: population study.
Teale GR; Moffitt DD; Mann CH; Luesley DM
BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7251):1693-6. PubMed ID: 10864542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A long-term study of women with normal colposcopy after referral with low-grade cytological abnormalities.
Smith MC; Keech SE; Perryman K; Soutter WP
BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1321-8. PubMed ID: 17059394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mild and moderate dyskaryosis: can women be selected for colposcopy on the basis of social criteria?
Anderson DJ; Flannelly GM; Kitchener HC; Fisher PM; Mann EM; Campbell MK; Templeton A
BMJ; 1992 Jul; 305(6845):84-7. PubMed ID: 1638252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of outcome in women with borderline glandular change on cervical cytology.
Jadoon BA; Kehoe S; Romain K; Clelland C; Sundar SS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Nov; 147(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 19740591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009).
Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Colposcopy in a family planning clinic: a future model?
Kitchener HC; Burnett RA; Wilson ES; Cordiner JW
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6583):1313-5. PubMed ID: 3109632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cigarette smoking and histological outcome in women with mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Luesley D; Blomfield P; Dunn J; Shafi M; Chenoy R; Buxton J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Jan; 101(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8297868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of follow-up for low-grade cytological abnormalities in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2000-2005.
Benard VB; Howe W; Saraiya M; Helsel W; Lawson HW
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Oct; 12(4):300-6. PubMed ID: 18820545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of human papillomavirus testing in the colposcopy clinic.
Bhaumik J; Mahadevan S; Davies AE
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Oct; 24(7):817-9. PubMed ID: 15763798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
Luesley D; Downey G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservative treatment of mild/moderate cervical dyskaryosis: long-term outcome.
Kirby AJ; Spiegelhalter DJ; Day NE; Fenton L; Swanson K; Mann EM; Macgregor JE
Lancet; 1992 Apr; 339(8797):828-31. PubMed ID: 1347856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Follow-up Papanicolaou smear for cervical atypia: are we missing significant disease? A HARNET Study.
Slawson DC; Bennett JH; Herman JM
J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 8454975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Invasive cancer of the cervix in women with mild dyskaryosis followed up cytologically.
Soutter WP; Fletcher A
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1421-3. PubMed ID: 8019256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
