These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10864608)

  • 1. Camino intracranial pressure monitor: prospective study of accuracy and complications.
    Martínez-Mañas RM; Santamarta D; de Campos JM; Ferrer E
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Jul; 69(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 10864608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice: reliability, handling characteristics and complications.
    Münch E; Weigel R; Schmiedek P; Schürer L
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1998; 140(11):1113-9; discussion 1119-20. PubMed ID: 9870055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Assessment in a 1000 cases.
    Gelabert-González M; Ginesta-Galan V; Sernamito-García R; Allut AG; Bandin-Diéguez J; Rumbo RM
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Apr; 148(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 16374566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fiberoptic intraparenchymal brain pressure monitoring with the Camino V420 monitor: reflections on our experience in 163 severely head-injured patients.
    Poca MA; Sahuquillo J; Arribas M; Báguena M; Amorós S; Rubio E
    J Neurotrauma; 2002 Apr; 19(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 11990350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of the Codman microsensor intracranial pressure monitoring system.
    Fernandes HM; Bingham K; Chambers IR; Mendelow AD
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1998; 71():44-6. PubMed ID: 9779140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of zero drift in the Codman intracranial pressure monitor: a study from 2 neurointensive care units.
    Al-Tamimi YZ; Helmy A; Bavetta S; Price SJ
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Jan; 64(1):94-8; discussion 98-9. PubMed ID: 19145157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistics and analysis of the Camino ICP monitor.
    Gregson BA; Banister K; Chambers IR
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2001 Jan; 70(1):138. PubMed ID: 11200140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Camino intracranial pressure sensor: is it optimal technology? An internal audit with a review of current intracranial pressure monitoring technologies.
    Piper I; Barnes A; Smith D; Dunn L
    Neurosurgery; 2001 Nov; 49(5):1158-64; discussion 1164-5. PubMed ID: 11846910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a new intracranial pressure monitoring device.
    Stendel R; Heidenreich J; Schilling A; Akhavan-Sigari R; Kurth R; Picht T; Pietilä T; Suess O; Kern C; Meisel J; Brock M
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2003 Mar; 145(3):185-93; discussion 193. PubMed ID: 12632114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intracranial pressure monitoring in children: comparison of external ventricular device with the fiberoptic system.
    Gambardella G; Zaccone C; Cardia E; Tomasello F
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1993 Dec; 9(8):470-3. PubMed ID: 8124675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the CAMINO intracranial pressure device in clinical practice.
    Schürer L; Münch E; Piepgras A; Weigel R; Schilling L; Schmiedek P
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1997; 70():296-8. PubMed ID: 9416352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk factors of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with fiberoptic devices: a critical review.
    Jensen RL; Hahn YS; Ciro E
    Surg Neurol; 1997 Jan; 47(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 8986159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors and complications of intracranial pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device.
    Bekar A; Doğan S; Abaş F; Caner B; Korfali G; Kocaeli H; Yilmazlar S; Korfali E
    J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 16(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 19071023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis between epidural (Gaeltec) and subdural (Camino) intracranial pressure probes.
    Weinstabl C; Richling B; Plainer B; Czech T; Spiss CK
    J Clin Monit; 1992 Apr; 8(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 1583546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications of brain tissue pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device.
    Bekar A; Gören S; Korfali E; Aksoy K; Boyaci S
    Neurosurg Rev; 1998; 21(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 10068186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cerebral monitoring devices: analysis of complications.
    Guyot LL; Dowling C; Diaz FG; Michael DB
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1998; 71():47-9. PubMed ID: 9779141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring of brain tissue pressure with a fiberoptic device.
    Gambardella G; d'Avella D; Tomasello F
    Neurosurgery; 1992 Nov; 31(5):918-21; discussion 921-2. PubMed ID: 1436417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications and safety associated with ICP monitoring: a study of 542 patients.
    Rossi S; Buzzi F; Paparella A; Mainini P; Stocchetti N
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1998; 71():91-3. PubMed ID: 9779154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External Ventricular Drains versus Intraparenchymal Intracranial Pressure Monitors in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Observational Study.
    Liu H; Wang W; Cheng F; Yuan Q; Yang J; Hu J; Ren G
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):794-800. PubMed ID: 25541084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective Evaluation of Noninvasive HeadSense Intracranial Pressure Monitor in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Undergoing Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.
    Herklots MW; Moudrous W; Oldenbeuving A; Roks G; Mourtzoukos S; Schoonman GG; Ganslandt O
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 106():557-562. PubMed ID: 28712896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.