These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

645 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10865391)

  • 1. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
    Mason PN; Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of spherical silica additions on marginal gaps and compressive strength of experimental glass-ionomer cements.
    Irie M; Nagaoka N; Tamada Y; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Minagi S; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2011 Oct; 24(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 22165460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Alavi M; Alavi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure using two bonding agents--lutting glass ionomer and 4-META.
    Sheela K; Sudeep PT; Hegde V; Francis RF; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10530186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amalgam repair: evaluation of bond strength and microleakage.
    Ozer F; Unlü N; Oztürk B; Sengun A
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 11931139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer liner on dentin adhesive interface of Class I cavity walls after thermocycling.
    Sampaio PC; de Almeida Júnior AA; Francisconi LF; Casas-Apayco LC; Pereira JC; Wang L; Atta MT
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 21913841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA; Fontana UF; Cury JA; Serra MC; Elderton RJ
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9728147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.