These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10865555)

  • 1. Declining trends in cesarean deliveries, Ohio 1989-1996: an analysis by indications.
    Koroukian SM; Rimm AA
    Birth; 2000 Mar; 27(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 10865555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the proportion of unnecessary Cesarean sections in Ohio using birth certificate data.
    Koroukian SM; Trisel B; Rimm AA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 51(12):1327-34. PubMed ID: 10086827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unnecessary cesarean delivery in Louisiana: an analysis of birth certificate data.
    Kabir AA; Steinmann WC; Myers L; Khan MM; Herrera EA; Yu S; Jooma N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):10-9; discussion 3A. PubMed ID: 14749628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey, 1999-2004.
    Denk CE; Kruse LK; Jain NJ
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 16948720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Declining cesarean section rates: a continuing trend?
    Millar WJ; Nair C; Wadhera S
    Health Rep; 1996; 8(1):17-24 (Eng); 17-24 (Fre). PubMed ID: 8844177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of excess weight gain during pregnancy and macrosomia to the cesarean delivery rate, 1990-2000.
    Rhodes JC; Schoendorf KC; Parker JD
    Pediatrics; 2003 May; 111(5 Pt 2):1181-5. PubMed ID: 12728135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cesarean delivery rate and indications in mainland China: a cross sectional study in 2011].
    Hou L; Li G; Zou L; Li C; Chen Y; Yuan Y; Wang X; Jia C; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):728-35. PubMed ID: 25537242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indications contributing to the decreasing cesarean delivery rate at an academic tertiary center.
    Cross SN; Greenberg JT; Pettker CM; Raab CA; Illuzzi JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 May; 1(2):165-172. PubMed ID: 33345822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.
    Gregory KD; Curtin SC; Taffel SM; Notzon FC
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Sep; 88(9):1384-7. PubMed ID: 9736883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contemporary Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates and Indications.
    Jaber S; Blanchard CT; Lu MY; Cozzi GD; Casey BM; Tita AT; Kim DJ; Szychowski JM; Subramaniam A
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e2026-e2033. PubMed ID: 37216971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in cesarean section use in California, 1983 to 1990.
    Stafford RS; Sullivan SD; Gardner LB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 168(4):1297-302. PubMed ID: 8475978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada.
    Liu S; Rusen ID; Joseph KS; Liston R; Kramer MS; Wen SW; Kinch R;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2004 Aug; 26(8):735-42. PubMed ID: 15307978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cesarean delivery among women with low-risk pregnancies: a comparison of birth certificates and hospital discharge data.
    Kahn EB; Berg CJ; Callaghan WM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 113(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19104357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indications for cesarean deliveries during a 7-year period in a tertiary hospital.
    Costa A; Policiano C; Clode N; Graça LM
    Acta Med Port; 2013; 26(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 24388250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary and Repeat Cesarean Deliveries: A Population-based Study in the United States, 1979-2010.
    Ananth CV; Friedman AM; Keyes KM; Lavery JA; Hamilton A; Wright JD
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jul; 28(4):567-574. PubMed ID: 28346271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.
    Stafford RS
    West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 2260286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.
    Barber EL; Lundsberg LS; Belanger K; Pettker CM; Funai EF; Illuzzi JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 118(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 21646928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
    Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.