These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10865641)
1. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: debating the benefits. Pro: similar costs to traditional surgery and procedure wins donors. Tan HP; Kavoussi LR; Sosa JA; Montgomery RA; Ratner LE Nephrol News Issues; 1999 Nov; 13(11):90-5. PubMed ID: 10865641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: debating the benefits. Con: persistent complications do not justify replacing "the gold standard". Serota AI Nephrol News Issues; 1999 Nov; 13(11):90-4. PubMed ID: 10865642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The economic impact of laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy on kidney transplantation. Mullins CD; Thomas SK; Pradel FG; Bartlett ST Transplantation; 2003 May; 75(9):1505-12. PubMed ID: 12792505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for live donor nephrectomy is more time- and cost-effective than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Lindström P; Häggman M; Wadström J Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):422-5. PubMed ID: 11928020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: a randomized study. Kok NF; Adang EM; Hansson BM; Dooper IM; Weimar W; van der Wilt GJ; Ijzermans JN Transplantation; 2007 Jun; 83(12):1582-7. PubMed ID: 17589341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic v open donor nephrectomy: a cost-utility analysis of the initial experience at a tertiary-care center. Pace KT; Dyer SJ; Phan V; Poulin EC; Schlachta CM; Mamazza J; Stewart RT; Honey RJ J Endourol; 2002 Sep; 16(7):495-508. PubMed ID: 12396443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical options for live-donor nephrectomy. Velidedeoglu E; Williams N; Brayman KL; Desai NM; Campos L; Palanjian M; Wocjik M; Bloom R; Grossman R; Mange K; Buyske J; Barker CF; Naji A; Markmann JF Transplant Proc; 2001; 33(7-8):3789-90. PubMed ID: 11750613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjective and objective comparison of critical care pathways for open donor nephrectomy. Knight MK; DiMarco DS; Myers RP; Gettman MT; Baghai M; Engen D; Segura JW J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2368-71. PubMed ID: 11992039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-center analysis of living donor nephrectomy: hand-assisted laparoscopic, pure laparoscopic, and traditional open. Slakey DP; Hahn JC; Rogers E; Rice JC; Gauthier PM; Ruiz-Deya G Prog Transplant; 2002 Sep; 12(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 12371047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy--an Iranian model for developing countries: a cost-effective no-rush approach. Simforoosh N; Basiri A; Tabibi A; Shakhssalim N Exp Clin Transplant; 2004 Dec; 2(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 15859937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Results and surgical complications of living donor nephrectomy: open vs hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy]. Branchereau J; Rigaud J; Normand G; Muller B; Lepage JY; Giral M; Karam G Prog Urol; 2009 Jun; 19(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 19467457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]