These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10865694)

  • 1. Spinal implants.
    Chotikul L
    RN; 2000 May; 63(5):28-31. PubMed ID: 10865694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment on the paper "Contralateral radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion" (Travis Hunt et al.).
    Bach CM
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):315. PubMed ID: 17520300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Adjacent segment disease after spine fusion and instrumentation].
    Qiu GX; Xu HG; Weng XS
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2005 Apr; 27(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 15960276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The argument for noninstrumented posterolateral fusion for patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Phillips FM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 14722409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.
    Huang RC; Girardi FP; Lim MR; Cammisa FP
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 15950686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lumbar spinal stenosis: surgical considerations.
    Nasca RJ
    J South Orthop Assoc; 2002; 11(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 12539936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The argument for instrumented decompressive posterolateral fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.
    Fischgrund JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(2):173-4. PubMed ID: 14722410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of cervical disk implants and cervical disk fusion treatments in human cadaveric models.
    Davies MA; Bryant SC; Larsen SP; Murrey DB; Nussman DS; Laxer EB; Darden BV
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 16813439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Application of diapason instrumentation for treatment of unstable lumbosacral spinal stenosis].
    Zhao H; Qiu GX; Zhao Y; Shen JX; Wang YP; Lin J
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Dec; 23(6):651-3. PubMed ID: 12901117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical application of interbody cage systems in the lumbar spine].
    Wang WJ; Zhou JN; Cao SJ
    Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 27(6):547-50. PubMed ID: 12658937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis in adolescence with reduction or fusion in situ: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome.
    Poussa M; Remes V; Lamberg T; Tervahartiala P; Schlenzka D; Yrjönen T; Osterman K; Seitsalo S; Helenius I
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(5):583-90; discussion 591-2. PubMed ID: 16508556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
    Masaki Y; Yamazaki M; Okawa A; Aramomi M; Hashimoto M; Koda M; Mochizuki M; Moriya H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Vertebral canal reconstruction by regrafting vertebral plate complex in situ with anterior and posterior fusion by internal fixation for spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Lin L; Wu HZ; Chen WF; Chen HX; Zhan HS
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Jan; 22(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 19203037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjacent segment disease following expansive lumbar laminoplasty.
    Kawaguchi Y; Ishihara H; Kanamori M; Yasuda T; Abe Y; Nogami S; Seki S; Hori T; Kimura T
    Spine J; 2007; 7(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 17482109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
    Sears W
    Spine J; 2005; 5(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15749617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
    Sears W
    Spine J; 2005; 5(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 15749616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spinal stenosis-what is the best treatment?
    Ausman JI
    Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):486. PubMed ID: 17961740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The safety and efficacy of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) as a replacement for iliac crest autograft for posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis: minimum 4-year follow-up of a pilot study.
    Vaccaro AR; Whang PG; Patel T; Phillips FM; Anderson DG; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Brower RS; Kurd MF; Appannagari A; Patel M; Fischgrund JS
    Spine J; 2008; 8(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 17588821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Instrumented fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: is it necessary?
    McLain RF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(2):170. PubMed ID: 14722408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.