These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10867074)

  • 1. Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in the General Dental Service in Scotland.
    Teh LH; Kerr WJ; McColl JH
    J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 27(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 10867074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation into the standard of orthodontic treatment carried out by GDPs after completion of a clinical assistant training.
    Power SM; Hodgkins JF; Stephens CD; Webb WG
    Br Dent J; 1996 Feb; 180(3):91-7. PubMed ID: 8746141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting the outcome of orthodontic treatment within the general dental service.
    Fox NA; Richmond S; Wright JL; Daniels CP
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Aug; 24(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 9313915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the peer assessment rating index.
    Dyken RA; Sadowsky PL; Hurst D
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11407767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.
    Birkeland K; Furevik J; Bøe OE; Wisth PJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 9239958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards.
    Richmond S; Shaw WC; Roberts CT; Andrews M
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Jun; 14(3):180-7. PubMed ID: 1628684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the PAR index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances.
    Kerr WJ; Buchanan IB; McColl JH
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Nov; 20(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 8286305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A closer look at General Dental Service orthodontics in England and Wales. I: Factors influencing effectiveness.
    Turbill EA; Richmond S; Wright JL
    Br Dent J; 1999 Aug; 187(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 10513115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Specialist orthodontics in the General Dental Service.
    Kelly BM; Springate SD
    Br Dent J; 1996 Mar; 180(6):209-15. PubMed ID: 8996924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personal audit in orthodontics.
    Richmond S
    Br J Orthod; 1993 May; 20(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 8518268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An audit of 'early debond' cases in the national outcomes audit of patients treated with upper and lower fixed appliances by Consultant Orthodontists in the UK.
    McMullan RE
    J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 32(4):257-61; discussion 247-8. PubMed ID: 16333047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What are the occlusal outcomes for unilateral cleft lip and palate patients? A national project in the UK.
    Deacon S; Bessant P; Russell JI; Hathorn I
    Br Dent J; 2007 Oct; 203(8):E18. PubMed ID: 17728793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An assessment of orthodontic treatment using occlusal indices.
    Chew MT; Sandham A
    Singapore Dent J; 2001 Jun; 24(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 11699355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment outcomes in 3 modes of orthodontic practice.
    Poulton DR; Baumrind S; Vlaskalic V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Feb; 121(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 11840132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J; Sandham A; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of operator changes on orthodontic treatment times and results in a postgraduate teaching environment.
    McGuinness NJ; McDonald JP
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Apr; 20(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 9633169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment outcomes in 4 modes of orthodontic practice.
    Poulton D; Vlaskalic V; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):351-4. PubMed ID: 15775950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthodontic treatment--improvement and standards using the peer assessment rating index.
    Onyeaso CO; Begole EA
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 16539550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome: a personal clinical audit using the PAR index (peer assessment rating).
    Otuyemi OD
    Afr Dent J; 1995; 9():1-8. PubMed ID: 9590893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.