These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10867120)

  • 1. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m in male patients with schizophrenia.
    Rosburg T; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I; Nowak H; Sauer H
    J Psychiatr Res; 2000; 34(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 10867120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m and its dependence on stimulus duration.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 113(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 11897542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Brain Topogr; 2002; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12371675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric differences in frequency dependent dipole orientation of the human auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I; Emmerich E; Nowak H; Sauer H
    Neurosci Lett; 1998 Dec; 258(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 9875538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?
    Lütkenhöner B; Lammertmann C; Knecht S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(5):263-78. PubMed ID: 11729329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dipole location shift within the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components N100m and mismatch negativity (MMNm).
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):906-13. PubMed ID: 15003772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term habituation of auditory evoked potential and neuromagnetic field components in dependence of the interstimulus interval.
    Rosburg T; Zimmerer K; Huonker R
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Sep; 205(4):559-70. PubMed ID: 20711562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch.
    Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 12811003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Side of the stimulated ear influences the hemispheric balance in coding tonal stimuli.
    Yu HY; Chen JT; Wu ZA; Yeh TC; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Neurol Res; 2007 Jul; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17535555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric asymmetry of the auditory evoked N100m response in relation to the crossing point between the central sulcus and Sylvian fissure.
    Ohtomo S; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Hatanaka K; Shirane R; Mizoi K; Yoshimoto T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Apr; 108(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 9607510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [N100m findings of auditory-evoked fields in patients with psychogenic hearing impairment].
    Sakamoto M; Itasaka Y; Ishikawa K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2007 Oct; 110(10):672-9. PubMed ID: 18018595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of lorazepam on the neuromagnetic mismatch negativity (MMNm) and auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Marinou V; Haueisen J; Smesny S; Sauer H
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2004 Sep; 29(9):1723-33. PubMed ID: 15127083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
    Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system.
    Nakasato N; Fujita S; Seki K; Kawamura T; Matani A; Tamura I; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Mar; 94(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 7536153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic anterolateral movement of N100m dipoles in evoked magnetic field reflects activation of isofrequency bands through horizontal fibers in human auditory cortex.
    Ozaki I; Jin YC; Suzuki Y; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Aug; 329(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 12165417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abnormalities of auditory evoked magnetic fields in the right hemisphere of schizophrenic females.
    Hajek M; Boehle C; Huonker R; Volz HP; Nowak H; Schrott PR; Sauer H
    Schizophr Res; 1997 Apr; 24(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 9134593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Interhemispheric differences of the middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields revealed by a whole head magnetoencephalography system].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1995 Oct; 47(10):989-94. PubMed ID: 7577145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
    Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.