These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10867494)

  • 1. [Laser conization and laser ablation of the transformation zone].
    Kieni S; Rageth JC
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2000; 40(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 10867494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
    Hamontri S; Israngura N; Rochanawutanon M; Bullangpoti S; Tangtrakul S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93 Suppl 2():S74-80. PubMed ID: 21299083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
    Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
    Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
    Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of carbon-dioxide laser surgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix.
    Favalli G; Lomini M; Schreiber C; Ciravolo G; Junasevic J; Pecorelli S; Bianchi UA
    Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 10375929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
    Milojkovic M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11818094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
    Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic significance of high-risk HPV persistence after laser CO2 conization for high-grade CIN: a prospective clinical study.
    Fallani MG; Penna C; Marchionni M; Bussani C; Pieralli A; Andersson KL; Fambrini M
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 18714574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
    Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
    Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
    Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-step management of cervical lesions.
    Darwish A; Gadallah H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Jun; 61(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 9688487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
    Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for borderline lesions of the uterine cervix].
    Matsuyama T; Tsukamoto N; Kashimura M; Iwasaka T; Saito T; Uchino H; Nakano H; Matsukuma K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Nov; 36(11):2063-71. PubMed ID: 6512325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization: a study of 522 consecutive cervical cones.
    Abdul-Karim FW; Nuñez C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jan; 65(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 3966027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: clinicotherapeutic management.
    Penna C; Fallani MG; Maggiorelli M; Zipoli E; Cardelli A; Marchionni M
    Tumori; 1998; 84(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 9862518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
    Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conization using electrosurgical conization and cold coagulation for international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IA1 squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
    Lee SJ; Kim WY; Lee JW; Kim HS; Choi YL; Ahn GH; Lee JH; Kim BG; Bae DS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Apr; 19(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 19407568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
    Hiramatsu K; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Morii E; Enomoto T; Kimura T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 23395556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.