These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10868604)

  • 1. The silent epidemic of Chlamydia trachomatis: the urgent need for detection and treatment in women.
    Walsh C; Anderson LA; Irwin K
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 May; 9(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 10868604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The US Chlamydia trachomatis control program: successes, shortcomings and ideas for the future.
    Martin DH
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Dec; 39(12):913-6. PubMed ID: 23169170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: bad news, good news, and next steps in prevention.
    Terán S; Walsh C; Irwin KL
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2001; 56(3):100-4. PubMed ID: 11506144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective screening for chlamydial infection in women: a comparison of three sets of criteria.
    Marrazzo JM; Fine D; Celum CL; DeLisle S; Handsfield HH
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(4):158-62. PubMed ID: 9258646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Policy guidelines for prevention and control.
    Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    MMWR Suppl; 1985 Aug; 34(3):53S-74S. PubMed ID: 2993844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female military recruits.
    Gaydos CA; Howell MR; Pare B; Clark KL; Ellis DA; Hendrix RM; Gaydos JC; McKee KT; Quinn TC
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Sep; 339(11):739-44. PubMed ID: 9731090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling the impact of opportunistic screening on the sequelae and public healthcare costs of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Australian women.
    Ward B; Rodger AJ; Jackson TJ
    Public Health; 2006 Jan; 120(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16271271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in short-term correctional institutions: summary of evidence reviewed for the 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines.
    Spaulding AC; Miller J; Trigg BG; Braverman P; Lincoln T; Reams PN; Staples-Horne M; Sumbry A; Rice D; Satterwhite CL
    Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Sep; 40(9):679-84. PubMed ID: 23945422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The silent epidemic of Chlamydia: what are we missing here?
    Sanfilippo JS
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 21(5):231-2. PubMed ID: 18794016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women 26 to 39 years of age in the United States, 1999 to 2010.
    Torrone EA; Geisler WM; Gift TL; Weinstock HS
    Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Apr; 40(4):335-7. PubMed ID: 23486500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Food for thought in women's health. The gynecologist: the new European gatekeeper in Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Polyzos NP; Vittoraki A; Tsappi M; Mauri D; Spiliopoulou A; Tzioras S; Kamposioras K; Ioakeimidou A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(10):1156-9. PubMed ID: 17068672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uptake of regular chlamydia testing by U.S. women: a longitudinal study.
    Heijne JC; Tao G; Kent CK; Low N
    Am J Prev Med; 2010 Sep; 39(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 20709256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections--United States, 1995.
    JAMA; 1997 Mar; 277(12):952-3. PubMed ID: 9091656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors influencing women's views on the acceptability and experience of being opportunistically screened for Chlamydia trachomatis in hospital settings.
    McMillan LE; Norman JE; Murray K; Reid ME
    Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Dec; 17(12):821-5. PubMed ID: 17212859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections--United States, 1995.
    Can Commun Dis Rep; 1998 Jan; 24(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9494223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chlamydia trachomatis infection among antenatal women in remote far west New South Wales, Australia.
    Lenton JA; Freedman E; Hoskin K; Knight V; Turley D; Balding B; Kennedy C; Chen MY; McNulty A
    Sex Health; 2007 Jun; 4(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 17524294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acquisition of Chlamydia trachomatis by young women during their first year of military service.
    Shafer MA; Boyer CB; Pollack LM; Moncada J; Chang YJ; Schachter J
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Mar; 35(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 18490868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduction in unnecessary Chlamydia screening among older women at title X-funded family planning sites following a structural intervention--San Francisco, 2009.
    Bernstein KT; Marcus JL; Snell A; Liska S; Rauch L; Philip SS
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Feb; 38(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21139515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Snaring a silent threat. Chlamydia declining thanks to screening and prevention.
    Hobus P
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2002 Oct; 10(10):63-6. PubMed ID: 12424886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.