348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10871486)
1. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1616-9. PubMed ID: 10871486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 187(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 12388961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Diro M; Adra A; Gilles JM; Nassar A; Rodriguez A; Salamat SM; Beydoun SN; O'Sullivan MJ; Yasin SY; Burkett G
J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of vaginal pH on the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.
Gunalp S; Bildirici I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Apr; 79(4):283-5. PubMed ID: 10746843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
Rust OA; Greybush M; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Balducci J
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol.
Crane JM; Delaney T; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D; Young DC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 15280123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of vaginal pH on labor induction with vaginal misoprostol.
Chandra S; Allen V; Lee W; Fanning C; Young D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jun; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 16009641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bishop score and the outcome of labor induction with misoprostol.
Szczesny W; Kjøllesdal M; Karlsson B; Nielsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 16752237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial.
Gherman RB; Browning J; O'Boyle A; Goodwin TM
J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 11499184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misoprostol as a labor induction agent.
Magtibay PM; Ramin KD; Harris DY; Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL
J Matern Fetal Med; 1998; 7(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 9502664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Fisher SA; Mackenzie VP; Davies GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):906-10. PubMed ID: 11641676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
