160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10871910)
1. Differences between dual X-ray absorptiometry using pencil beam and fan beam modes and their determinants in vivo and in vitro.
Ruetsche AG; Lippuner K; Jaeger P; Casez JP
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 10871910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Mar; 56(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 7750022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total body and regional bone mineral densitometry (BMD) and soft tissue measurements: correlations of BMD parameter to lumbar spine and hip.
Franck H; Munz M
Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Aug; 67(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 10920214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Dec; 61(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 9383269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lateral spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement with fan-beam design: effect of osteophytic calcifications on lateral and anteroposterior spine BMD.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M; v Lilienfeld-Toal H
Rheumatol Int; 1995; 15(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8835296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Differences in Bone Mineral Density Measurement With 3 Hologic Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan Modes.
Yu W; Zhang Z; Pan W; Guan W; Lin Q; Xia W; Li T; Hsieh E
J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(4):645-650. PubMed ID: 33504451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Bone Mineral Density Differ between Fan-Beam and Pencil-Beam?: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.
Yoon BH; Koh YD; Yoo JI; Kim S; Lee GY; Park SB; Ha YC
J Bone Metab; 2021 Feb; 28(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 33730785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers--bone mineral density and body composition studies.
Oldroyd B; Smith AH; Truscott JG
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):977-87. PubMed ID: 12879093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DXA estimates of vertebral volumetric bone mineral density in children: potential advantages of paired posteroanterior and lateral scans.
Leonard MB; Shults J; Zemel BS
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16931343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical shape modelling of hip and lumbar spine morphology and their relationship in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development.
Pavlova AV; Saunders FR; Muthuri SG; Gregory JS; Barr RJ; Martin KR; Hardy RJ; Cooper R; Adams JE; Kuh D; Aspden RM
J Anat; 2017 Aug; 231(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 28561274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discordantly high spinal bone mineral density values in patients with adult lumbar scoliosis.
Pappou IP; Girardi FP; Sandhu HS; Parvataneni HK; Cammisa FP; Schneider R; Frelinghuysen P; Lane JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(14):1614-20. PubMed ID: 16778698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine?
Salzmann SN; Shirahata T; Yang J; Miller CO; Carlson BB; Rentenberger C; Carrino JA; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 30343044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudi females: relation to vitamin D status, pregnancy, and lactation.
Ghannam NN; Hammami MM; Bakheet SM; Khan BA
Calcif Tissue Int; 1999 Jul; 65(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 10369729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Population-based geographic variations in DXA bone density in Europe: the EVOS Study. European Vertebral Osteoporosis.
Lunt M; Felsenberg D; Adams J; Benevolenskaya L; Cannata J; Dequeker J; Dodenhof C; Falch JA; Johnell O; Khaw KT; Masaryk P; Pols H; Poor G; Reid D; Scheidt-Nave C; Weber K; Silman AJ; Reeve J
Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(3):175-89. PubMed ID: 9205628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Reginster JY; Deroisy R; Zegels B; Jupsin I; Albert A; Franchimont P
Clin Rheumatol; 1995 Mar; 14(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 7789060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
