193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10872150)
1. MRA versus digital subtraction angiography in acute subarachnoid haemorrhage: a blinded multireader study of prospectively recruited patients.
Jäger HR; Mansmann U; Hausmann O; Partzsch U; Moseley IF; Taylor WJ
Neuroradiology; 2000 May; 42(5):313-26. PubMed ID: 10872150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surveillance imaging after intracranial stent implantation: non-invasive imaging compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Golshani B; Lazzaro MA; Raslau F; Darkhabani Z; Baruah D; Eastwood D; Fitzsimmons BF; Zaidat OO
J Neurointerv Surg; 2013 Jul; 5(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22641863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils.
Ferré JC; Carsin-Nicol B; Morandi X; Carsin M; de Kersaint-Gilly A; Gauvrit JY; Desal HA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 18809272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Subarachnoid hemorrhage: assessment in the acute phase with angiography, with high-resolution magnetic resonance (angio-MR)].
Gasparotti R; Bonetti M; Crispino M; Pavia M; Chiesa A; Galli G
Radiol Med; 1994 Mar; 87(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 8146356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection and characterization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Comparison of 3T MRA and DSA.
Mine B; Pezzullo M; Roque G; David P; Metens T; Lubicz B
J Neuroradiol; 2015 Jun; 42(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 25454398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard.
Attali J; Benaissa A; Soize S; Kadziolka K; Portefaix C; Pierot L
J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Jan; 8(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25352582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-Enhanced and Time-of-Flight MRA at 3T Compared with DSA for the Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the WEB Device.
Timsit C; Soize S; Benaissa A; Portefaix C; Gauvrit JY; Pierot L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 27102311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T compared to digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of ruptured and coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study.
Urbach H; Dorenbeck U; von Falkenhausen M; Wilhelm K; Willinek W; Schaller C; Flacke S
Neuroradiology; 2008 May; 50(5):383-9. PubMed ID: 18196229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Follow-up after embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective comparison of two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography, three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography, and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.
Serafin Z; Strześniewski P; Lasek W; Beuth W
Neuroradiology; 2012 Nov; 54(11):1253-60. PubMed ID: 22488210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The non-invasive detection of intracranial aneurysms: are neuroradiologists any better than other observers?
White PM; Wardlaw JM; Lindsay KW; Sloss S; Patel DK; Teasdale EM
Eur Radiol; 2003 Feb; 13(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 12599005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: magnetic resonance angiography versus digital subtraction angiography.
Shahzad R; Younas F
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Jun; 21(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 21711985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance angiography or digital subtraction catheter angiography for follow-up of coiled aneurysms: do we need both?
Lane A; Vivian P; Coulthard A
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 25857748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of contrast-free MRA at 3.0T in cases of intracranial aneurysms with or without subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Yan R; Zhang B; Wang L; Li Q; Zhou F; Ren J; Zhai Z; Li Z; Cui H
Clin Imaging; 2018; 49():131-135. PubMed ID: 29414507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of intracranial aneurysms: multi-detector row CT angiography compared with DSA.
Jayaraman MV; Mayo-Smith WW; Tung GA; Haas RA; Rogg JM; Mehta NR; Doberstein CE
Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):510-8. PubMed ID: 14699177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Gauvrit JY; Leclerc X; Caron S; Taschner CA; Lejeune JP; Pruvo JP
Stroke; 2006 Apr; 37(4):1033-7. PubMed ID: 16528000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling: Comparison of contrast-enhanced MRA, time-of-flight MRA, and digital subtraction angiography.
Marciano D; Soize S; Metaxas G; Portefaix C; Pierot L
J Neuroradiol; 2017 Feb; 44(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 27836654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrepancy between MRA and DSA in identifying the shape of small intracranial aneurysms.
Kwak Y; Son W; Kim YS; Park J; Kang DH
J Neurosurg; 2020 Jul; 134(6):1887-1893. PubMed ID: 32707543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance angiography compared to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage.
Gouliamos A; Gotsis E; Vlahos L; Samara C; Kapsalaki E; Rologis D; Kapsalakis Z; Papavasiliou C
Neuroradiology; 1992; 35(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 1289738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Depiction of branch vessels arising from intracranial aneurysm sacs: Time-of-flight MR angiography versus CT angiography.
Goto M; Kunimatsu A; Shojima M; Mori H; Abe O; Aoki S; Hayashi N; Gonoi W; Miyati T; Ino K; Yano K; Saito N; Ohtomo K
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Nov; 126():177-84. PubMed ID: 25270230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ECG-triggered non-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries in comparison to DSA in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease.
Partovi S; Rasmus M; Schulte AC; Rengier F; Jacob AL; Aschwanden M; Karmonik C; Bongartz G; Bilecen D
MAGMA; 2013 Jun; 26(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 23117342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
