146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10872960)
1. An evaluation of the efficacy of a curved bristle and conventional toothbrush. A comparative clinical study.
Chava VK
J Periodontol; 2000 May; 71(5):785-9. PubMed ID: 10872960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy of the Colgate Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush vs Oral-B CrossAction toothbrush on established plaque and gingivitis: a 6-week clinical study.
Nathoo S; Rustogi KN; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Zhang YP; Volpe AR; Proskin HM
Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S19-24; quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A six-week study comparing the efficacy of a rotary electric toothbrush with a conventional toothbrush.
Silverstone LM; Tilliss TS; Cross-Poline GN; Van der Linden E; Stach DJ; Featherstone MJ
Clin Prev Dent; 1992; 14(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 1499245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of Different Bristle Designs of Toothbrushes and Periodontal Status among Fixed Orthodontic Patients: A Double-blind Crossover Design.
Naik SP; Punathil S; Shetty P; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Feb; 19(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 29422463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.
Sowinski J; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Chaknis P; Kemp J; Sprosta AA; Devizio W
Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 19146124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the use of different modes of mechanical oral hygiene in prevention of plaque and gingivitis.
Rosema NA; Timmerman MF; Versteeg PA; van Palenstein Helderman WH; Van der Velden U; Van der Weijden GA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1386-94. PubMed ID: 18672987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The curved-bristle toothbrush: an aid for the handicapped population.
Williams NJ; Schuman NJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(4):291-3. PubMed ID: 2970481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Six-month comparison of powered versus manual toothbrushing for safety and efficacy in the absence of professional instruction in mechanical plaque control.
Dentino AR; Derderian G; Wolf M; Cugini M; Johnson R; Van Swol RL; King D; Marks P; Warren P
J Periodontol; 2002 Jul; 73(7):770-8. PubMed ID: 12146537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized, parallel design study to evaluate the effects of a Sonicare and a manual toothbrush on plaque and gingivitis.
Moritis K; Jenkins W; Hefti A; Schmitt P; McGrady M
J Clin Dent; 2008; 19(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 18763689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical plaque removing efficacy of a new power toothbrush.
Ernst CP; Nauth C; Willershausen B; Warren PR
Am J Dent; 1998 Sep; 11(Spec No):S13-6. PubMed ID: 10530094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A single-use and 3-month clinical investigation of the comparative efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush.
Cronin MJ; Dembling W; Conforti NJ; Liebman J; Cugini M; Warren PR
Am J Dent; 2001 Nov; 14 Spec No():19B-24B. PubMed ID: 12003483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Plaque removal efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush compared to two control manual toothbrushes in single use studies.
Heins P; Bartizek RD; Walters PA; Biesbrock AR
Am J Dent; 2002 Sep; 15 Spec No():28A-32A. PubMed ID: 12512989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical comparison of the gingivitis reduction and plaque-removal efficacy of a new manual toothbrush.
Nathoo S; Chaknis P; Petrone M; DeVizio W; Volpe AR
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2004 Oct; 25(10 Suppl 2):37-45. PubMed ID: 15789981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The comparative plaque removal efficacy of two advanced manual toothbrush designs in two independent clinical studies.
Singh SM; Battista GW; Rustogi KN; DeVizio W; Volpe AR; Petrone ME; Proskin HM
J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(3):83-6. PubMed ID: 11505966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative evaluation of an ultrasonic and a manual toothbrush on the oral hygiene status and stain removing efficacy.
Vandana KL; Penumatsa GS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Mar; 22(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 15255444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.
Barnes CM; Russell CM; Reinhardt RA; Payne JB; Lyle DM
J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(3):71-7. PubMed ID: 16305005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A thirty-day evaluation of the Rowenta Dentiphant powered toothbrush in children for safety and efficacy.
Yankell SL; Emling RC
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):96-100. PubMed ID: 9238885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a new manual toothbrush on gingivitis reduction and plaque removal.
Mankodi S; Wachs GN; Petrone DM; Chaknis P; Petrone M; DeVizio W; Volpe AR
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2004 Oct; 25(10 Suppl 2):28-36. PubMed ID: 15789980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative efficacy of Colgate Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush and Colgate Plus (manual) toothbrush on established plaque and gingivitis: a 30-day clinical study in New Jersey.
Sowinski JA; Battista GW; Petrone DM; Petrone ME; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; DeVizio W; Volpe AR;
Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S4-8; quiz S34. PubMed ID: 11908374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety, efficacy and acceptability of a new power toothbrush: a 3-month comparative clinical investigation.
Warren PR; Cugini M; Marks P; King DW
Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 11806476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
