157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10874286)
1. The future of involuntary civil commitment in the U.S.A. after Kansas v. Hendricks.
La Fond JQ
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(2-3):153-67. PubMed ID: 10874286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A population at risk: civil commitment of substance abusers after Kansas v. Hendricks.
Krongard ML
Calif Law Rev; 2002 Jan; 90(1):111-63. PubMed ID: 16506331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual predator commitment laws: lessons for law and the behavioral sciences.
Janus ES
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 10736574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kansas v. Hendricks.
Grudzinskas AJ; Henry MG
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 9460048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk and the preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States.
Mercado CC; Ogloff JR
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 17157911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. Supreme Court upholds Kansas law allowing indefinite civil commitment of sexual offenders.
Psychiatr Serv; 1997 Aug; 48(8):1093-4. PubMed ID: 9255849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. After Hendricks: defining constitutional treatment for Washington State's Civil commitment program.
Lieb R
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():474-88. PubMed ID: 12839920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex offenders, mental illness and criminal responsibility: the constitutional boundaries of civil commitment after Kansas v. Hendricks.
Falk AJ
Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):117-47. PubMed ID: 10207572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual offender commitment in the United States: legislative and policy concerns.
Fitch WL
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():489-501. PubMed ID: 12839921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria in Florida.
Levenson JS
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Aug; 28(4):357-68. PubMed ID: 15499820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The paraphilias, obsessive compulsive spectrum disorder, and the treatment of sexually deviant behaviour.
Bradford JM
Psychiatr Q; 1999; 70(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 10457546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kansas v. Hendricks: is it time to lock the door and throw away the key for sexually violent predators?
Kolebuck MD
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):537-62. PubMed ID: 9693491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sexual predator laws in Canada.
Glancy GD; Regehr C; Bradford J
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 11471791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychopathy, criminal responsibility, and civil commitment as a sexual predator.
Schopp RF; Slain AJ
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(2-3):247-74. PubMed ID: 10874289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The "mad" vs. the "bad" revisited: managing predatory behavior.
Tucker W
Psychiatr Q; 1999; 70(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 10457547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex offender commitments in Minnesota: a descriptive study of second generation commitments.
Janus ES; Walbek NH
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(2-3):343-74. PubMed ID: 10874293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Commentary: inventing diagnosis for civil commitment of rapists.
Zander TK
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 19092062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexually violent predator laws and the liberal state: an ominous threat to individual liberty.
La Fond JQ
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(2):158-71. PubMed ID: 18346787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mental disorder, predisposition, prediction, and ability to control: evaluating sex offenders for civil commitment.
Elwood RW
Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 19901235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confining sex offenders: the Supreme Court takes a dangerous path.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 1997 Oct; 48(10):1265-7. PubMed ID: 9323744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
