These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10875380)

  • 1. Relative loudness perception of low and high frequency sounds in the open and occluded ear.
    Keidser G; Katsch R; Dillon H; Grant F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3351-7. PubMed ID: 10875380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can maximum comfortable loudness levels in hearing impaired listeners be predicted from ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds recorded with high frequency probes?
    Rawool VW
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 11409793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of occluded ear impedances on the eardrum SPL produced by hearing aids.
    Gilman S; Dirks DD; Stern R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Aug; 70(2):370-86. PubMed ID: 7288025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):241-58. PubMed ID: 10509859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of ear canal occlusion on hearing sensitivity: A loudness experiment.
    Bonnet F; Nélisse H; Voix J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3574. PubMed ID: 29960431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between the acoustic reflex threshold and levels of loudness categories in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):308-11. PubMed ID: 10582531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between the uncomfortable loudness level and the acoustic reflex threshold for pure tones in normally-hearing and impaired listeners--a meta-analysis.
    Olsen SO
    Audiology; 1999; 38(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 10206514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds.
    Moore BC; Vickers DA; Baer T; Launer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2757-72. PubMed ID: 10335628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing.
    Hall JW; Harvey AD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 4046585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A probe earmold system for measuring eardrum SPL under hearing-aid conditions.
    Gilman S; Dirks DD
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 6719011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing aid saturation, coherence, and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 1600219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part II: Asymmetric and Bimodal Hearing.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Spirrov D; Wouters J; Francart T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518805363. PubMed ID: 30334496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort.
    Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verifying loudness perception after hearing aid fitting.
    Cox RM; Gray GA
    Am J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 10(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 11808725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of an objective electrophysiological loudness scaling: a kernel-based novelty detection approach.
    Mariam M; Delb W; Schick B; Strauss DJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jul; 55(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 22592125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The acoustic reflex threshold: not predictive for loudness perception in normally-hearing listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 10582530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.