526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10875458)
1. Isotope selection for permanent prostate implants? An evaluation of 103Pd versus 125I based on radiobiological effectiveness and dosimetry.
Dicker AP; Lin CC; Leeper DB; Waterman FM
Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 May; 18(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 10875458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High dose rate brachytherapy as prostate cancer monotherapy reduces toxicity compared to low dose rate palladium seeds.
Grills IS; Martinez AA; Hollander M; Huang R; Goldman K; Chen PY; Gustafson GS
J Urol; 2004 Mar; 171(3):1098-104. PubMed ID: 14767279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability of prostate brachytherapy pre-implant dosimetry: a multi-institutional analysis.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Wallner KE; Blasko JC; Michalski J; Aronowitz J; Grimm P; Moran BJ; McLaughlin PW; Usher J; Lief JH; Allen ZA
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16344253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LDR vs. HDR brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: the view from radiobiological models.
King CR
Brachytherapy; 2002; 1(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 15062170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of the radial function on I-125 seeds used for permanent prostate implantation.
Pickett B; Pouliot J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 15324917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of tumor repopulation on radiotherapy planning.
Wang JZ; Li XA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 15629615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term complications with prostate implants: iodine-125 vs. palladium-103.
Peschel RE; Chen Z; Roberts K; Nath R
Radiat Oncol Investig; 1999; 7(5):278-88. PubMed ID: 10580897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Isotope selection for patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy.
Cha CM; Potters L; Ashley R; Freeman K; Wang XH; Waldbaum R; Leibel S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Sep; 45(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 10487561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodology for biologically-based treatment planning for combined low-dose-rate (permanent implant) and high-dose-rate (fractionated) treatment of prostate cancer.
Zaider M; Zelefsky MJ; Cohen GN; Chui CS; Yorke ED; Ben-Porat L; Happersett L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):702-13. PubMed ID: 15708248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acute genitourinary toxicity after high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxicity.
Akimoto T; Ito K; Saitoh J; Noda SE; Harashima K; Sakurai H; Nakayama Y; Yamamoto T; Suzuki K; Nakano T; Niibe H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 16168838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: summary of American Brachytherapy Society recommendations.
Nag S
Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 May; 18(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 10875454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morbidity effect of the time gap between supplemental beam radiation and Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy.
Corriveau J; Wallner K; Merrick G; True L; Cavanagh W; Sutlief S; Butler W
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15062149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.
Mangili P; Stea L; Cattani F; Lappi S; Giglioli F; Calamia E; Ziglio F; Martinelli R; Longobardi B
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15066291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose escalation in permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer: dosimetric and biological considerations.
Li XA; Wang JZ; Stewart RD; DiBiase SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(17):2753-65. PubMed ID: 14516099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of biologically equivalent dose-volume parameters for the treatment of prostate cancer with concomitant boost IMRT versus IMRT combined with brachytherapy.
Pieters BR; van de Kamer JB; van Herten YR; van Wieringen N; D'Olieslager GM; van der Heide UA; Koning CC
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 18378028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose rate dependence of the relative biological effectiveness of 103Pd for continuous low dose rate irradiation of BA1112 rhabdomyosarcoma cells in vitro relative to acute exposures.
Nath R; Bongiorni P; Chen Z; Gragnano J; Rockwell S
Int J Radiat Biol; 2005 Sep; 81(9):689-99. PubMed ID: 16368647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric study of Cs-131, I-125, and Pd-103 seeds for permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Yang R; Wang J; Zhang H
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2009 Dec; 24(6):701-5. PubMed ID: 20025550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?
Potters L; Calugaru E; Jassal A; Presser J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16682144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
