These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10875904)

  • 1. Spatiotemporal analysis of neuromagnetic events underlying the emergence of coordinative instabilities.
    Fuchs A; Mayville JM; Cheyne D; Weinberg H; Deecke L; Kelso JA
    Neuroimage; 2000 Jul; 12(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 10875904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amplitude and phase dynamics associated with acoustically paced finger tapping.
    Boonstra TW; Daffertshofer A; Peper CE; Beek PJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 16860292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory temporal resolution in children assessed by magnetoencephalography.
    Diedler J; Pietz J; Bast T; Rupp A
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1691-5. PubMed ID: 17921870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical brain imaging reveals spatio-temporal dynamics of timbre perception in humans.
    Meyer M; Baumann S; Jancke L
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 16798014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multivariate analysis of evoked responses in EEG and MEG data.
    Friston KJ; Stephan KM; Heather JD; Frith CD; Ioannides AA; Liu LC; Rugg MD; Vieth J; Keber H; Hunter K; Frackowiak RS
    Neuroimage; 1996 Jun; 3(3 Pt 1):167-74. PubMed ID: 9345487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective influences of cross-modal spatial-cues on preattentive auditory processing: a whole-head magnetoencephalography study.
    Mathiak K; Hertrich I; Zvyagintsev M; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 16054843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural mechanisms of the time-order error: an MEG study.
    Hairston IS; Nagarajan SS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1163-74. PubMed ID: 17583992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional MRI reveals the existence of modality and coordination-dependent timing networks.
    Jantzen KJ; Steinberg FL; Kelso JA
    Neuroimage; 2005 May; 25(4):1031-42. PubMed ID: 15850722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory evoked fields to variations of interaural time delay.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15955427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judging time intervals using a model of perceptuo-motor control.
    Grealy MA; Craig CM; Bourdin C; Coleman SG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1185-95. PubMed ID: 15453973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Close similarity between spatiotemporal frequency tunings of human cortical responses and involuntary manual following responses to visual motion.
    Amano K; Kimura T; Nishida S; Takeda T; Gomi H
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 101(2):888-97. PubMed ID: 19073805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The spatiotemporal pattern of auditory cortical responses during verbal hallucinations.
    van de Ven VG; Formisano E; Röder CH; Prvulovic D; Bittner RA; Dietz MG; Hubl D; Dierks T; Federspiel A; Esposito F; Di Salle F; Jansma B; Goebel R; Linden DE
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):644-55. PubMed ID: 15978843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences between auditory evoked responses recorded during spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks.
    Anurova I; Artchakov D; Korvenoja A; Ilmoniemi RJ; Aronen HJ; Carlson S
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):1181-92. PubMed ID: 14568487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatiotemporal patterns of movement-related fields in stroke patients.
    Kotani K; Kinomoto Y; Yamada M; Deguchi J; Tonoike M; Horii K; Miyatake S; Kuroiwa T; Noguchi T
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():63. PubMed ID: 16012611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques.
    Palomäki KJ; Tiitinen H; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):364-79. PubMed ID: 16099350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in a finger-tapping task separates motor from timing mechanisms and induces frequency doubling.
    Levit-Binnun N; Handzy NZ; Peled A; Modai I; Moses E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):721-33. PubMed ID: 17488200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
    Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary motor area contribution to attentional reorienting after distraction.
    Horváth J; Maess B; Berti S; Schröger E
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 18287943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neuromagnetic responses reflect the temporal pitch change of regular interval sounds.
    Ritter S; Günter Dosch H; Specht HJ; Rupp A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):533-43. PubMed ID: 15964207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.